Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chad

Chad: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 19.58 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
19.58
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
172nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
19.58
in 2014
All-time low
19.58
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chad, 2014–2019

051015202014201620192014: 19.62015: 19.62016: 19.62017: 19.62018: 19.62019: 19.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Chad recorded 19.58 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Chad ranks 172nd of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chad, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Chad, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 19.58 —
2015 19.58 +0.0%
2016 19.58 +0.0%
2017 19.58 +0.0%
2018 19.58 +0.0%
2019 19.58 +0.0%

Chad compared with similar countries

  • Chad's 19.58 is below the median for low income countries, which is 45.65, 43% of the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Chad's 19.58 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 50.73, 39% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Chad

  1. 169 Jamaica 24.5 compare
  2. 170 Papua New Guinea 21.67 compare
  3. 171 Somalia 20.67 compare
  4. 173 Maldives 18.29 compare
  5. 174 Equatorial Guinea 17.92 compare
  6. 175 Liberia 15.62 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Chad

All data for Chad →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Chad?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Chad was 19.58 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Chad?
The highest recorded value was 19.58 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Chad?
The lowest recorded value was 19.58 in 2014.
How does Chad rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Chad ranks 172nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Chad?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Chad data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chad. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/chad/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Chad</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.