Chad vs Papua New Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Chad
19.58
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
21.67
in 2019
Chad rank
172nd
Papua New Guinea rank
170th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Chad
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 21.67 against 19.58 in Chad, a difference of 2.09.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 172nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Chad or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 21.67 against 19.58 in Chad as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Chad and Papua New Guinea?
- 2.09, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Chad and Papua New Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Chad ranks 172nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 170th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.