Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in North Macedonia
North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 78.95 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in North Macedonia, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in North Macedonia stood at 78.95. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 3.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in North Macedonia peaked at 78.95 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 75.45, in 2009.
That places North Macedonia 115th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in North Macedonia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 76.33 | — |
| 2006 | 77.51 | +1.6% |
| 2007 | 78.51 | +1.3% |
| 2008 | 75.98 | -3.2% |
| 2009 | 75.45 | -0.7% |
| 2010 | 77.07 | +2.1% |
| 2011 | 77.91 | +1.1% |
| 2012 | 78.94 | +1.3% |
| 2013 | 78.93 | -0.0% |
| 2014 | 78.95 | +0.0% |
North Macedonia compared with similar countries
- North Macedonia's 78.95 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 80.61, 98% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- North Macedonia's 78.95 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 81.43, 97% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.76 | 75.45 | 78.51 | 5 |
| 2010s | 78.36 | 77.07 | 78.95 | 5 |
Countries ranked near North Macedonia
- 114 Bulgaria 78.98 compare
- 116 Cameroon 78.89 compare
- 117 Cote d'Ivoire 78.65 compare
- 117 Equatorial Guinea 78.65 compare
More reference data data for North Macedonia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.102 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1665 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0308 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4328 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.342 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.224 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6296 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.168 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in North Macedonia?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in North Macedonia was 78.95 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in North Macedonia?
- The highest recorded value was 78.95 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in North Macedonia?
- The lowest recorded value was 75.45 in 2009.
- How does North Macedonia rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- North Macedonia ranks 115th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) rising or falling in North Macedonia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this North Macedonia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.