Equatorial Guinea vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Equatorial Guinea
78.65
in 2014
North Macedonia
78.95
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
117th
North Macedonia rank
115th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 78.95 against 78.65 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.3.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and North Macedonia ranks 115th of 183 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.02 | 76.76 | 19.74 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 72.16 | 78.36 | 6.2 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Equatorial Guinea or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 78.95 against 78.65 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia?
- 0.3, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and North Macedonia ranks 115th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.