Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Kiribati
Kiribati: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 89.98 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Kiribati, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Kiribati recorded 89.98 for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in 2014.
The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 26.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Kiribati peaked at 91.21 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 71.38, in 2005.
Kiribati ranks 49th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 71.38 | — |
| 2006 | 71.45 | +0.1% |
| 2007 | 78.91 | +10.4% |
| 2008 | 89.68 | +13.6% |
| 2009 | 90.87 | +1.3% |
| 2010 | 91.21 | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 90.34 | -1.0% |
| 2012 | 90.17 | -0.2% |
| 2013 | 89.87 | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 89.98 | +0.1% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 89.98 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.37, 1.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 89.98 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 92.48, 97% of the median. (27 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.46 | 71.38 | 90.87 | 5 |
| 2010s | 90.31 | 89.87 | 91.21 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 46 Solomon Islands 90.63 compare
- 47 Trinidad and Tobago 90.57 compare
- 48 Cyprus 90.09 compare
- 49 New Zealand 89.98 compare
- 51 Ghana 89.87 compare
- 52 Djibouti 89.65 compare
- 52 Hungary 89.65 compare
More reference data data for Kiribati
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0058 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 5.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 12.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 11.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 0.0269 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4435 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.4165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 5.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Kiribati?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Kiribati was 89.98 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 91.21 in 2010.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 71.38 in 2005.
- How does Kiribati rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Kiribati ranks 49th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is up 26.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.