Kiribati vs New Zealand: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Kiribati
89.98
in 2014
New Zealand
89.98
in 2014
Kiribati rank
49th
New Zealand rank
49th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Kiribati
- New Zealand
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 89.98 against 89.98 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
Kiribati ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 49th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.46 | 89.18 | 8.72 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 90.31 | 89.63 | 0.6865 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Kiribati or New Zealand?
- Kiribati, at 89.98 against 89.98 in New Zealand as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Kiribati and New Zealand?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and New Zealand?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Kiribati and New Zealand rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Kiribati ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 49th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.