Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Dominica
Dominica: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 87.36 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Dominica, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Dominica is 87.36, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 1.6% on the previous year and up 20.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Dominica peaked at 87.36 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 72.38, in 2006.
That places Dominica 61st out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Dominica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 72.61 | — |
| 2006 | 72.38 | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 87.23 | +20.5% |
| 2008 | 86.69 | -0.6% |
| 2009 | 87.16 | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 86.79 | -0.4% |
| 2011 | 85.09 | -2.0% |
| 2012 | 85.76 | +0.8% |
| 2013 | 85.95 | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 87.36 | +1.6% |
Dominica compared with similar countries
- Dominica's 87.36 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 80.61, 1.1× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Dominica's 87.36 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 84.26, 1.0× the median. (32 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.21 | 72.38 | 87.23 | 5 |
| 2010s | 86.19 | 85.09 | 87.36 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Dominica
- 58 Qatar 88.74 compare
- 59 Saint Lucia 88.56 compare
- 60 Montenegro 87.47 compare
- 61 Turkey 87.36 compare
- 63 Bahamas 87.04 compare
- 63 United Kingdom 87.04 compare
More reference data data for Dominica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0139 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 40.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 15.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0111 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied 4.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0463 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.0481 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 9.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Dominica?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Dominica was 87.36 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Dominica?
- The highest recorded value was 87.36 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Dominica?
- The lowest recorded value was 72.38 in 2006.
- How does Dominica rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Dominica ranks 61st out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) rising or falling in Dominica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Dominica data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.