Dominica vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Dominica
87.36
in 2014
United Kingdom
87.04
in 2014
Dominica rank
61st
United Kingdom rank
63rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Dominica
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 87.36 against 87.04 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.32.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Dominica ranks 61st and United Kingdom ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.21 | 82.75 | 1.54 | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 86.19 | 86.31 | 0.1161 | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Dominica or United Kingdom?
- Dominica, at 87.36 against 87.04 in United Kingdom as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Dominica and United Kingdom?
- 0.32, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and United Kingdom?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominica and United Kingdom rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Dominica ranks 61st and United Kingdom ranks 63rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.