Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 35.62 in 2014. ◆ Volatile
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Democratic Republic of Congo, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at 35.62.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 6.8% on the previous year.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at 38.24 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2005.
That places Democratic Republic of Congo 170th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 0 | — |
| 2010 | 13.62 | — |
| 2011 | 27.75 | +103.8% |
| 2012 | 32.91 | +18.6% |
| 2013 | 38.24 | +16.2% |
| 2014 | 35.62 | -6.8% |
Democratic Republic of Congo compared with similar countries
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 35.62 is below the median for low income countries, which is 57.9, 62% of the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Democratic Republic of Congo's 35.62 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 71.41, 50% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 2010s | 29.63 | 13.62 | 38.24 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 235.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 220.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 3,924 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 3,057 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3528 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure Management 601.15 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Democratic Republic of Congo was 35.62 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 38.24 in 2013.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2005.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 170th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.