Democratic Republic of Congo vs Rwanda: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 38.24 against 35.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 2.62.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 167th and Rwanda ranks 166th of 181 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 25.06 | 25.06 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 29.63 | 51.41 | 21.78 | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Democratic Republic of Congo or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 38.24 against 35.62 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda?
- 2.62, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 167th and Rwanda ranks 166th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.