Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Serbia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Serbia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Serbia

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Serbia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Serbia: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 91.25 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

91.25

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

36th

of 188 countries

All-time high

91.25

in 2014

All-time low

91.25

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Serbia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Serbia is 91.25, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Serbia 36th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Serbia

33 Lithuania 93 compare
34 Greece 92.5 compare
35 Mali 91.67 compare
36 Latvia 91.25 compare
36 Malaysia 91.25 compare
39 Singapore 90.75 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Serbia?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Serbia was 91.25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Serbia?: The highest recorded value was 91.25 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Serbia?: The lowest recorded value was 91.25 in 2014.
How does Serbia rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Serbia ranks 36th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Serbia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Serbia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.