Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Mali?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Mali data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Mali

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Mali
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Mali: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 91.67 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

91.67

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

35th

of 188 countries

All-time high

91.67

in 2014

All-time low

91.67

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Mali, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Mali recorded 91.67 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Mali 35th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Mali

32 Switzerland 93.25 compare
33 Lithuania 93 compare
34 Greece 92.5 compare
36 Latvia 91.25 compare
36 Malaysia 91.25 compare
36 Serbia 91.25 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Mali

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.79 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 580.67 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 30.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 110.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 36.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.725 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 36.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 273.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 10,460 (2050)

All data for Mali →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Mali?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Mali was 91.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Mali?: The highest recorded value was 91.67 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Mali?: The lowest recorded value was 91.67 in 2014.
How does Mali rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Mali ranks 35th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Mali?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mali data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.