Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Peru?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Peru data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Peru

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Peru
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Peru: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 87.5 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

87.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

50th

of 188 countries

All-time high

87.5

in 2014

All-time low

87.5

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Peru, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Peru recorded 87.5 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Peru 50th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Peru

48 Nicaragua 88.33 compare
49 Haiti 88.12 compare
50 Belize 87.5 compare
50 Bhutan 87.5 compare
50 Chile 87.5 compare
50 Cyprus 87.5 compare
50 Dominica 87.5 compare
50 El Salvador 87.5 compare
50 Libya 87.5 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Peru

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.15 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3808 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.84 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 35.25 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.07 (2050)

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Peru?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Peru was 87.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Peru?: The highest recorded value was 87.5 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Peru?: The lowest recorded value was 87.5 in 2014.
How does Peru rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Peru ranks 50th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Peru?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Peru data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.