Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Malawi?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Malawi data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Malawi

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Malawi
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Malawi: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 14.56 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

14.56

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

176th

of 188 countries

All-time high

14.56

in 2014

All-time low

14.56

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Malawi, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Malawi recorded 14.56 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Malawi 176th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Malawi

173 Kiribati 22.5 compare
174 Liberia 17.5 compare
174 Tajikistan 17.5 compare
177 Afghanistan 13.89 compare
178 Namibia 13.12 compare
179 Somalia 12.5 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Malawi

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1596 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.09 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.71 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3426 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.71 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5353 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6012 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.92 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.87 (2050)

All data for Malawi →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Malawi?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Malawi was 14.56 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Malawi?: The highest recorded value was 14.56 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Malawi?: The lowest recorded value was 14.56 in 2014.
How does Malawi rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Malawi ranks 176th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Malawi?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Malawi data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.