Kiribati vs Malawi: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Kiribati
22.5
in 2019
Malawi
14.56
in 2019
Kiribati rank
173rd
Malawi rank
176th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Kiribati
  • Malawi
0510152025201420162019

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 22.5 against 14.56 in Malawi, a difference of 7.94.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Malawi's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.

Kiribati ranks 173rd and Malawi ranks 176th of 188 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Kiribati or Malawi?
Kiribati, at 22.5 against 14.56 in Malawi as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Kiribati and Malawi?
7.94, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Malawi?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Kiribati and Malawi rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Kiribati ranks 173rd and Malawi ranks 176th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.