Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Canada?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Canada data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Canada

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Canada
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Canada: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 61.11 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

61.11

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

140th

of 188 countries

All-time high

61.11

in 2014

All-time low

61.11

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Canada, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Canada recorded 61.11 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Canada 140th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Canada

139 Ghana 61.25 compare
141 Guinea-Bissau 60 compare
141 Mozambique 60 compare
143 Congo 58.75 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Canada

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 6.86 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 20.47 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.92 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.92 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 20.47 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 99.83 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 22.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.45 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 15.88 (2050)

All data for Canada →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Canada?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Canada was 61.11 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Canada?: The highest recorded value was 61.11 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Canada?: The lowest recorded value was 61.11 in 2014.
How does Canada rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Canada ranks 140th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Canada?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Canada data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.