Canada vs Congo, Rep.: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Canada
61.11
in 2019
Congo, Rep.
58.75
in 2019
Canada rank
140th
Congo, Rep. rank
143rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Canada
  • Congo, Rep.
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Canada currently reports 61.11 against 58.75 in Congo, Rep., a difference of 2.36.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 140th and Congo, Rep. ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Canada or Congo, Rep.?
Canada, at 61.11 against 58.75 in Congo, Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Canada and Congo, Rep.?
2.36, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Congo, Rep.?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Canada and Congo, Rep. rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Canada ranks 140th and Congo, Rep. ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.