Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Maldives

Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) was 43.8 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
43.8
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
149th
of 191 countries
All-time high
43.8
in 2014
All-time low
43.8
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Maldives, 2014–2019

0102030402014201620192014: 43.82015: 43.82016: 43.82017: 43.82018: 43.82019: 43.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Maldives recorded 43.8 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Maldives 149th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Maldives, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Maldives, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 43.8 —
2015 43.8 +0.0%
2016 43.8 +0.0%
2017 43.8 +0.0%
2018 43.8 +0.0%
2019 43.8 +0.0%

Maldives compared with similar countries

  • Maldives's 43.8 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 69.12, 63% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Maldives's 43.8 is below the median for South Asia, which is 72.73, 60% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Maldives

  1. 146 Russia 45.28 compare
  2. 147 Guinea-Bissau 44.81 compare
  3. 148 Algeria 44.07 compare
  4. 150 Honduras 43.28 compare
  5. 151 Mozambique 43.24 compare
  6. 152 Djibouti 42.9 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Maldives

All data for Maldives →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Maldives?
Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) in Maldives was 43.8 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Maldives?
The highest recorded value was 43.8 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) recorded in Maldives?
The lowest recorded value was 43.8 in 2014.
How does Maldives rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
Maldives ranks 149th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Maldives?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Maldives data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Maldives. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/maldives/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) in Maldives</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.