Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Algeria?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Algeria data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Algeria

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Algeria
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Algeria: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 44.07 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

44.07

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

146th

of 188 countries

All-time high

44.07

in 2014

All-time low

44.07

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Algeria, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Algeria recorded 44.07 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Algeria ranks 146th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Algeria

143 Libya 45.77 compare
144 Russia 45.28 compare
145 Guinea-Bissau 44.81 compare
147 Maldives 43.8 compare
148 Honduras 43.28 compare
149 Mozambique 43.24 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Algeria

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 8,710 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 388.95 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 9,169 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 22.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8614 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0616 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 66.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 228.27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3259 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,004 (2050)

All data for Algeria →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Algeria?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Algeria was 44.07 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Algeria?: The highest recorded value was 44.07 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Algeria?: The lowest recorded value was 44.07 in 2014.
How does Algeria rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Algeria ranks 146th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Algeria?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Algeria data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.