Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Jordan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Jordan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Jordan

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Jordan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Jordan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 87.61 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

87.61

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

43rd

of 188 countries

All-time high

87.61

in 2014

All-time low

87.61

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Jordan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Jordan recorded 87.61 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Jordan ranks 43rd of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Jordan

40 Switzerland 89.15 compare
41 Norway 88.21 compare
42 El Salvador 87.89 compare
44 Eswatini 87.32 compare
45 Laos 86.79 compare
46 Kenya 86.56 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Jordan

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.7273 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.425 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0464 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0055 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7273 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 21.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 472.26 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.9269 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 592.34 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 646.84 (2050)

All data for Jordan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Jordan?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Jordan was 87.61 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Jordan?: The highest recorded value was 87.61 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Jordan?: The lowest recorded value was 87.61 in 2014.
How does Jordan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Jordan ranks 43rd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Jordan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Jordan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.