Jordan vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Jordan
87.61
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic
86.79
in 2019
Jordan rank
44th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
46th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Jordan
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 87.61 against 86.79 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.82.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 44th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 46th of 190 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Jordan or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Jordan, at 87.61 against 86.79 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0.82, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Jordan ranks 44th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 46th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.