How does Afghanistan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?

Afghanistan ranks 125th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Afghanistan?

Over the last ten years it is up 10.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Afghanistan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Afghanistan

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Afghanistan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Afghanistan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 57.29 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

57.29

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

125th

of 188 countries

All-time high

57.29

in 2016

All-time low

51.78

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Afghanistan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Afghanistan stood at 57.29. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.6% over ten years.

Afghanistan ranks 125th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Afghanistan

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Afghanistan

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.847 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.63 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.62 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.65 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.38 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.63 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.01 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8991 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4362 (2050)

All data for Afghanistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Afghanistan?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Afghanistan was 57.29 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Afghanistan?: The highest recorded value was 57.29 in 2016.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Afghanistan?: The lowest recorded value was 51.78 in 2014.
How does Afghanistan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Afghanistan ranks 125th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Afghanistan?: Over the last ten years it is up 10.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Afghanistan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.