Afghanistan vs United Arab Emirates: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD)
Afghanistan
57.29
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
56.45
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
127th
United Arab Emirates rank
129th
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Afghanistan
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 57.29 against 56.45 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.84.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 127th and United Arab Emirates ranks 129th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd), Afghanistan or United Arab Emirates?
- Afghanistan, at 57.29 against 56.45 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) between Afghanistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.84, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and United Arab Emirates?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and United Arab Emirates rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd)?
- Afghanistan ranks 127th and United Arab Emirates ranks 129th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.