Total Reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname

Suriname: Total Reserves, per square kilometre was 0.0022 units per square kilometre in 2016. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2016)
0.0022 units per square kilometre
Change on year
up 23.2%
World rank
155th
of 164 countries
All-time high
0.0055 units per square kilometre
in 2012
All-time low
0.0005 units per square kilometre
in 2000
Years of data
17
2000–2016

Total Reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname, 2000–2016

00.0020.0040.0062000200820162000: 0 units per square kilometre2001: 0.001 units per square kilometre2002: 0.001 units per square kilometre2003: 0.001 units per square kilometre2004: 0.001 units per square kilometre2005: 0.001 units per square kilometre2006: 0.001 units per square kilometre2007: 0.002 units per square kilometre2008: 0.004 units per square kilometre2009: 0.004 units per square kilometre2010: 0.004 units per square kilometre2011: 0.004 units per square kilometre2012: 0.006 units per square kilometre2013: 0.005 units per square kilometre2014: 0.004 units per square kilometre2015: 0.002 units per square kilometre2016: 0.002 units per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2016, total reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname stood at 0.0022 units per square kilometre.

The figure is up 23.2% on the previous year and up 62.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, total reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname peaked at 0.0055 units per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.0005 units per square kilometre, in 2000.

That places Suriname 155th out of 164 countries with data for 2016, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Total Reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname, year by year

Annual values for Total Reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname, 2000 to 2016.
Year units per square kilometre Change
2000 0.0005 units per square kilometre
2001 0.0008 units per square kilometre +75.3%
2002 0.0007 units per square kilometre -18.2%
2003 0.0007 units per square kilometre -0.3%
2004 0.0008 units per square kilometre +22.2%
2005 0.0008 units per square kilometre -2.4%
2006 0.0014 units per square kilometre +70.7%
2007 0.0023 units per square kilometre +71.3%
2008 0.0035 units per square kilometre +51.6%
2009 0.0037 units per square kilometre +6.2%
2010 0.0038 units per square kilometre +0.9%
2011 0.0044 units per square kilometre +17.7%
2012 0.0055 units per square kilometre +24.8%
2013 0.0046 units per square kilometre -16.7%
2014 0.0036 units per square kilometre -22.3%
2015 0.0018 units per square kilometre -50.2%
2016 0.0022 units per square kilometre +23.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.0015 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.0037 units per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0037 units per square kilometre 0.0018 units per square kilometre 0.0055 units per square kilometre 7

Countries ranked near Suriname

  1. 152 Guyana 0.0026 units per square kilometre compare
  2. 153 Namibia 0.0026 units per square kilometre compare
  3. 154 Mozambique 0.0026 units per square kilometre compare
  4. 156 Equatorial Guinea 0.0017 units per square kilometre compare
  5. 157 Bolivia 0.0017 units per square kilometre compare
  6. 158 Chad 0.0011 units per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 174 places →

More reference data data for Suriname

All data for Suriname →

Frequently asked questions

What is total reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname?
Total reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname was 0.0022 units per square kilometre in 2016, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest total reserves, per square kilometre recorded in Suriname?
The highest recorded value was 0.0055 units per square kilometre in 2012.
What is the lowest total reserves, per square kilometre recorded in Suriname?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0005 units per square kilometre in 2000.
How does Suriname rank for total reserves, per square kilometre?
Suriname ranks 155th out of 164 countries with data for 2016.
Is total reserves, per square kilometre rising or falling in Suriname?
Over the last ten years it is up 62.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Suriname data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Total Reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/total-reserves-per-square-kilometre/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/total-reserves-per-square-kilometre/suriname/">Total Reserves, per square kilometre in Suriname</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Total Reserves ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 4,193 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.