Namibia vs Suriname: Total Reserves, per square kilometre
Namibia
0.0026 units per square kilometre
in 2018
Suriname
0.0022 units per square kilometre
in 2016
Namibia rank
153rd
Suriname rank
155th
Total Reserves, per square kilometre over time
- Namibia
- Suriname
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0026 units per square kilometre against 0.0022 units per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0004 units per square kilometre.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Namibia ranks 153rd and Suriname ranks 155th of 164 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.002 units per square kilometre | 0.0037 units per square kilometre | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total reserves, per square kilometre, Namibia or Suriname?
- Namibia, at 0.0026 units per square kilometre against 0.0022 units per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total reserves, per square kilometre between Namibia and Suriname?
- 0.0004 units per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for total reserves, per square kilometre?
- Namibia ranks 153rd and Suriname ranks 155th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total Reserves, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total Reserves divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.