Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Croatia
Croatia: Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in was 78.8% in 2017. ▲ Rising
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Croatia, 2007–2017
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2017, teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Croatia stood at 78.8%.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.5% on the previous year and up 30.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Croatia peaked at 81.4% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 60.2%, in 2007.
Croatia ranks 5th of 57 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Croatia, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 60.2% | — |
| 2011 | 81.4% | +35.2% |
| 2014 | 79.0% | -3.0% |
| 2015 | 74.7% | -5.5% |
| 2017 | 78.8% | +5.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.2% | 60.2% | 60.2% | 1 |
| 2010s | 78.5% | 74.7% | 81.4% | 4 |
Countries ranked near Croatia
More reference data data for Croatia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2598 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1516 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1326 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8711 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5399 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7218 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Croatia?
- Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in in Croatia was 78.8% in 2017, according to UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
- What is the highest teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 81.4% in 2011.
- What is the lowest teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 60.2% in 2007.
- How does Croatia rank for teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in?
- Croatia ranks 5th out of 57 countries with data for 2017.
- Is teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 30.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as part of Teaching staff compensation as a percentage of total expenditure in upper secondary public institutions (%). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Teacher compensation expressed as a percentage of direct expenditure in public educational institutions (instructional and non-instructional) of the specified level of education. Financial aid to students and other transfers are excluded from direct expenditure. Staff compensation includes salaries, contributions by employers for staff retirement programmes, and other allowances and benefits. To calculate this indicator, divide teacher compensation in public institutions of a given level of education (ex. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) by total expenditure (current and capital) in public institutions of the same level of education, and multiply by 100. Limitations: Although countries responding to the UIS questionnaire on educational expenditure are required to follow common definitions for staff compensation, in some cases government budget classifications may differ. It is also often difficult to separate staff compensation between teachers and non-teachers, as these are usually grouped together in country's accounting systems. In general, respondent countries must use estimation methods to separate teacher and non-teacher staff compensation. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/