Strong Civil Society Index in Guatemala
Guatemala: Strong Civil Society Index was 0.837 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Strong Civil Society Index in Guatemala, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for strong civil society index in Guatemala is 0.837, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 6.8% on the previous year and down 0.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, strong civil society index in Guatemala peaked at 0.868 in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0.039, in 1932.
Guatemala ranks 62nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Strong Civil Society Index in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.345 | — |
| 1790 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.345 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.286 | -17.1% |
| 1812 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.286 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.349 | +22.0% |
| 1824 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.349 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.291 | -16.6% |
| 1840 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.291 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.149 | -48.8% |
| 1890 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.149 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.15 | +0.7% |
| 1900 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.15 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.102 | -32.0% |
| 1905 | 0.102 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.102 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.102 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.102 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.102 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.111 | +8.8% |
| 1911 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.111 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.271 | +144.1% |
| 1922 | 0.271 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.277 | +2.2% |
| 1924 | 0.213 | -23.1% |
| 1925 | 0.213 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.213 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.213 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.213 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.213 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.154 | -27.7% |
| 1931 | 0.05 | -67.5% |
| 1932 | 0.039 | -22.0% |
| 1933 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.039 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.116 | +197.4% |
| 1941 | 0.116 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.116 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.116 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.276 | +137.9% |
| 1945 | 0.802 | +190.6% |
| 1946 | 0.851 | +6.1% |
| 1947 | 0.851 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.851 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.851 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.851 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.851 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.83 | -2.5% |
| 1953 | 0.83 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.662 | -20.2% |
| 1955 | 0.312 | -52.9% |
| 1956 | 0.208 | -33.3% |
| 1957 | 0.211 | +1.4% |
| 1958 | 0.23 | +9.0% |
| 1959 | 0.257 | +11.7% |
| 1960 | 0.257 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.241 | -6.2% |
| 1962 | 0.254 | +5.4% |
| 1963 | 0.254 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.254 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.254 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.297 | +16.9% |
| 1967 | 0.339 | +14.1% |
| 1968 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.339 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.254 | -25.1% |
| 1971 | 0.17 | -33.1% |
| 1972 | 0.17 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.181 | +6.5% |
| 1974 | 0.262 | +44.8% |
| 1975 | 0.29 | +10.7% |
| 1976 | 0.234 | -19.3% |
| 1977 | 0.238 | +1.7% |
| 1978 | 0.174 | -26.9% |
| 1979 | 0.131 | -24.7% |
| 1980 | 0.123 | -6.1% |
| 1981 | 0.123 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.092 | -25.2% |
| 1983 | 0.064 | -30.4% |
| 1984 | 0.207 | +223.4% |
| 1985 | 0.454 | +119.3% |
| 1986 | 0.601 | +32.4% |
| 1987 | 0.721 | +20.0% |
| 1988 | 0.721 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.721 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.742 | +2.9% |
| 1991 | 0.732 | -1.3% |
| 1992 | 0.732 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.732 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.785 | +7.2% |
| 1995 | 0.785 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.822 | +4.7% |
| 1997 | 0.868 | +5.6% |
| 1998 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.868 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.84 | -3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.84 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.839 | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.839 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.846 | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 0.834 | -1.4% |
| 2019 | 0.848 | +1.7% |
| 2020 | 0.782 | -7.8% |
| 2021 | 0.725 | -7.3% |
| 2022 | 0.679 | -6.3% |
| 2023 | 0.679 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.784 | +15.5% |
| 2025 | 0.837 | +6.8% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 0.837 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.6945, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 0.837 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.837, 1.0× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.345 | 0.345 | 0.345 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.345 | 0.345 | 0.345 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.345 | 0.345 | 0.345 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.2919 | 0.286 | 0.345 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.335 | 0.286 | 0.349 | 9 |
| 1830s | 0.3432 | 0.291 | 0.349 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.291 | 0.291 | 0.291 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.291 | 0.291 | 0.291 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.291 | 0.291 | 0.291 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.291 | 0.291 | 0.291 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.2768 | 0.149 | 0.291 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.1491 | 0.149 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.1212 | 0.102 | 0.15 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.111 | 0.111 | 0.111 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.2208 | 0.111 | 0.277 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.0516 | 0.039 | 0.154 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.4946 | 0.116 | 0.851 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.5242 | 0.208 | 0.851 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.2828 | 0.241 | 0.339 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.2104 | 0.131 | 0.29 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3827 | 0.064 | 0.721 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7934 | 0.732 | 0.868 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.868 | 0.868 | 0.868 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.849 | 0.834 | 0.868 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7477 | 0.679 | 0.837 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is strong civil society index in Guatemala?
- Strong civil society index in Guatemala was 0.837 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest strong civil society index recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 0.868 in 1997.
- What is the lowest strong civil society index recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.039 in 1932.
- How does Guatemala rank for strong civil society index?
- Guatemala ranks 62nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is strong civil society index rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Strong Civil Society Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 236 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which interest groups, labor unions, charities, and other civil society organizations are autonomous from the state and can freely pursue their goals. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (strongest).