Strong Civil Society Index in Cuba
Cuba: Strong Civil Society Index was 0.033 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Strong Civil Society Index in Cuba, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.033 for strong civil society index in 2025.
That represents a change of down 23.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, strong civil society index in Cuba peaked at 0.78 in 1940 and was at its lowest, 0.03, in 1962.
That places Cuba 169th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Strong Civil Society Index in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.089 | — |
| 1790 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.089 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.058 | -34.8% |
| 1845 | 0.09 | +55.2% |
| 1846 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.09 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.105 | +16.7% |
| 1879 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.105 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.566 | +439.0% |
| 1899 | 0.75 | +32.5% |
| 1900 | 0.75 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.75 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.75 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.75 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.75 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.75 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.648 | -13.6% |
| 1907 | 0.752 | +16.0% |
| 1908 | 0.752 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.752 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.776 | +3.2% |
| 1911 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.776 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.76 | -2.1% |
| 1926 | 0.742 | -2.4% |
| 1927 | 0.742 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.669 | -9.8% |
| 1929 | 0.508 | -24.1% |
| 1930 | 0.508 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.508 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.508 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.537 | +5.7% |
| 1934 | 0.753 | +40.2% |
| 1935 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.753 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.78 | +3.6% |
| 1941 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.78 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.731 | -6.3% |
| 1952 | 0.701 | -4.1% |
| 1953 | 0.536 | -23.5% |
| 1954 | 0.536 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.536 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.536 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.481 | -10.3% |
| 1958 | 0.481 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.277 | -42.4% |
| 1960 | 0.081 | -70.8% |
| 1961 | 0.069 | -14.8% |
| 1962 | 0.03 | -56.5% |
| 1963 | 0.03 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.03 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 0.03 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.034 | +13.3% |
| 1967 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.034 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.045 | +32.4% |
| 1989 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.045 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.048 | +6.7% |
| 2009 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.048 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.046 | -4.2% |
| 2014 | 0.043 | -6.5% |
| 2015 | 0.043 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.058 | +34.9% |
| 2017 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.075 | +29.3% |
| 2019 | 0.079 | +5.3% |
| 2020 | 0.043 | -45.6% |
| 2021 | 0.033 | -23.3% |
| 2022 | 0.033 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.033 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.033 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.033 | +0.0% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 0.033 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.6945, 5% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 0.033 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.837, 4% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.089 | 0.089 | 0.089 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.0864 | 0.058 | 0.09 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.093 | 0.09 | 0.105 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.105 | 0.105 | 0.105 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.2156 | 0.105 | 0.75 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.7404 | 0.648 | 0.752 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.776 | 0.776 | 0.776 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.7301 | 0.508 | 0.776 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.6579 | 0.508 | 0.753 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.5595 | 0.277 | 0.78 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0406 | 0.03 | 0.081 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.034 | 0.034 | 0.034 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0362 | 0.034 | 0.045 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.045 | 0.045 | 0.045 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0456 | 0.045 | 0.048 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0546 | 0.043 | 0.079 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0347 | 0.033 | 0.043 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 166 Tajikistan 0.068 compare
- 167 Nicaragua 0.037 compare
- 168 Russia 0.036 compare
- 169 Turkmenistan 0.033 compare
- 171 Eritrea 0.032 compare
- 172 Afghanistan 0.03 compare
More reference data data for Cuba
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.529 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9214 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3791 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is strong civil society index in Cuba?
- Strong civil society index in Cuba was 0.033 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest strong civil society index recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.78 in 1940.
- What is the lowest strong civil society index recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.03 in 1962.
- How does Cuba rank for strong civil society index?
- Cuba ranks 169th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is strong civil society index rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Strong Civil Society Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Data by V-Dem. Expert estimates of the extent to which interest groups, labor unions, charities, and other civil society organizations are autonomous from the state and can freely pursue their goals. The index ranges from 0 to 1 (strongest).