Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Thailand
Thailand: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index was 3 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Thailand, 2005–2025
Source: Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, stability of democratic institutions index in Thailand stood at 3.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 200.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, stability of democratic institutions index in Thailand peaked at 7 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 1, in 2015.
That places Thailand 57th out of 128 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Thailand, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 7 | — |
| 2007 | 2.5 | -64.3% |
| 2009 | 4 | +60.0% |
| 2011 | 3 | -25.0% |
| 2013 | 4.5 | +50.0% |
| 2015 | 1 | -77.8% |
| 2017 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3 | +200.0% |
| 2023 | 3 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3 | +0.0% |
Thailand compared with similar countries
- Thailand's 3 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 5, 60% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
- Thailand's 3 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 2.75, 1.1× the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 | 2.5 | 7 | 3 |
| 2010s | 2.1 | 1 | 4.5 | 5 |
| 2020s | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Thailand
- 54 Peru 4.5 compare
- 54 Philippines 4.5 compare
- 56 Honduras 4 compare
- 57 Angola 3 compare
- 57 Bangladesh 3 compare
- 57 Benin 3 compare
- 57 Cote d'Ivoire 3 compare
- 57 El Salvador 3 compare
- 57 Georgia 3 compare
- 57 Guatemala 3 compare
- 57 Iraq 3 compare
- 57 Kyrgyzstan 3 compare
- 57 Madagascar 3 compare
- 57 Mauritania 3 compare
- 57 Nigeria 3 compare
- 57 Papua New Guinea 3 compare
- 57 Serbia 3 compare
- 57 Tanzania 3 compare
- 57 Togo 3 compare
- 57 Turkey 3 compare
- 57 Uganda 3 compare
More reference data data for Thailand
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 13.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 13.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 7.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 65.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 7.92 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is stability of democratic institutions index in Thailand?
- Stability of democratic institutions index in Thailand was 3 in 2025, according to Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Thailand?
- The highest recorded value was 7 in 2005.
- What is the lowest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Thailand?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 in 2015.
- How does Thailand rank for stability of democratic institutions index?
- Thailand ranks 57th out of 128 countries with data for 2025.
- Is stability of democratic institutions index rising or falling in Thailand?
- Over the last ten years it is up 200.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Thailand data come from?
- The figures come from Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.