Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Stability of Democratic Institutions Index was 3 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Kyrgyzstan, 2005–2025
Source: Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for stability of democratic institutions index in Kyrgyzstan is 3, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 50.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, stability of democratic institutions index in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 6 in 2015 and was at its lowest, 2, in 2005.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 57th of 128 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Stability of Democratic Institutions Index in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2 | — |
| 2007 | 5 | +150.0% |
| 2009 | 2 | -60.0% |
| 2011 | 5 | +150.0% |
| 2013 | 5.5 | +10.0% |
| 2015 | 6 | +9.1% |
| 2017 | 6 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 6 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 5 | -16.7% |
| 2023 | 3 | -40.0% |
| 2025 | 3 | +0.0% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 3 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3, 1.0× the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 3 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 6.5, 46% of the median. (29 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| 2010s | 5.7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| 2020s | 3.67 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 54 Peru 4.5 compare
- 54 Philippines 4.5 compare
- 56 Honduras 4 compare
- 57 Angola 3 compare
- 57 Bangladesh 3 compare
- 57 Benin 3 compare
- 57 Cote d'Ivoire 3 compare
- 57 El Salvador 3 compare
- 57 Georgia 3 compare
- 57 Guatemala 3 compare
- 57 Iraq 3 compare
- 57 Madagascar 3 compare
- 57 Mauritania 3 compare
- 57 Nigeria 3 compare
- 57 Papua New Guinea 3 compare
- 57 Serbia 3 compare
- 57 Tanzania 3 compare
- 57 Thailand 3 compare
- 57 Togo 3 compare
- 57 Turkey 3 compare
- 57 Uganda 3 compare
More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2833 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0857 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.95 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.8535 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4667 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is stability of democratic institutions index in Kyrgyzstan?
- Stability of democratic institutions index in Kyrgyzstan was 3 in 2025, according to Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 6 in 2015.
- What is the lowest stability of democratic institutions index recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 in 2005.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for stability of democratic institutions index?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 57th out of 128 countries with data for 2025.
- Is stability of democratic institutions index rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Stability of Democratic Institutions Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Indicates the extent to which democratic institutions are effective and efficient and all relevant actors accept them.