Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP in Brazil
Brazil: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP in Brazil, 1960–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in Brazil is 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 11.6% on the previous year and up 75.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in Brazil peaked at 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP, in 1960.
Brazil ranks 47th of 210 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP in Brazil, year by year
| Year | metric tons per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1961 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1963 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1964 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1965 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1966 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1967 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1968 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1969 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1970 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +66.9% |
| 1971 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +23.1% |
| 1972 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +54.9% |
| 1973 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +30.0% |
| 1974 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +29.3% |
| 1975 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +53.8% |
| 1976 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +27.7% |
| 1977 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +56.5% |
| 1978 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +27.8% |
| 1979 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +34.8% |
| 1980 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +106.5% |
| 1981 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +42.7% |
| 1982 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +24.5% |
| 1983 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +72.9% |
| 1984 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +17.5% |
| 1985 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1986 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 1987 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +8.3% |
| 1988 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +8.9% |
| 1989 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1990 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +21.0% |
| 1991 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +28.3% |
| 1992 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +33.1% |
| 1993 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -9.2% |
| 1994 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -28.7% |
| 1995 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +2.1% |
| 1996 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +52.1% |
| 1997 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 1998 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +21.2% |
| 1999 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +95.0% |
| 2000 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +12.2% |
| 2001 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +39.5% |
| 2002 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +32.3% |
| 2003 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +0.8% |
| 2004 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -17.7% |
| 2005 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -28.3% |
| 2006 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 2007 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 2008 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2009 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +12.0% |
| 2010 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2011 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 2012 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +17.0% |
| 2013 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 2014 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +18.9% |
| 2015 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +39.7% |
| 2016 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2017 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2018 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +10.8% |
| 2019 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +5.7% |
| 2020 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +33.3% |
| 2021 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2022 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -2.8% |
| 2023 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | -4.4% |
| 2024 | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | +11.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in Brazil?
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp in Brazil was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 2003.
- What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per US$ of GDP in 1960.
- How does Brazil rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp?
- Brazil ranks 47th out of 210 countries with data for 2024.
- Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 75.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.