Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture in Brazil

Brazil: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture was 882,935 metric tons in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
882,935 metric tons
Change on year
up 11.3%
World rank
14th
of 215 countries
All-time high
882,935 metric tons
in 2024
All-time low
0 metric tons
in 1960
Years of data
65
1960–2024

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture in Brazil, 1960–2024

0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196019922024

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in metric tons.

Analysis

The most recent figure for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture in Brazil is 882,935 metric tons, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 65 years on record.

That represents a change of up 11.3% on the previous year and up 56.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture in Brazil peaked at 882,935 metric tons in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons, in 1960.

That places Brazil 14th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 1 metric tons 0 metric tons 10 metric tons 10
1970s 466.5 metric tons 19 metric tons 1,687 metric tons 10
1980s 10,572 metric tons 3,737 metric tons 18,170 metric tons 10
1990s 59,114 metric tons 20,490 metric tons 140,657 metric tons 10
2000s 268,389 metric tons 172,450 metric tons 365,137 metric tons 10
2010s 524,001 metric tons 411,787 metric tons 600,735 metric tons 10
2020s 739,362 metric tons 630,935 metric tons 882,935 metric tons 5

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 11 Ecuador 1.24 million metric tons compare
  2. 12 Myanmar 1.21 million metric tons compare
  3. 13 Thailand 998,645 metric tons compare
  4. 15 Japan 802,045 metric tons compare
  5. 16 Iran 709,391 metric tons compare
  6. 17 North Korea 685,700 metric tons compare

See the full ranking of 215 places →

More reference data data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture in Brazil?
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture in Brazil was 882,935 metric tons in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 882,935 metric tons in 2024.
What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons in 1960.
How does Brazil rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture?
Brazil ranks 14th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 56.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture
Unit
metric tons
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
215 places, 12,849 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Aquaculture is the farming of aquatic organisms including fish, molluscs, crustaceans and aquatic plants. Capture fishery production is the volume of wild fish catches landed for all commercial, industrial, recreational and subsistence purposes.