Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita was 0.0005 metric tons per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Zimbabwe, 1960–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per person.
Analysis
In 2024, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Zimbabwe stood at 0.0005 metric tons per person.
The figure is up 12.9% on the previous year and down 67.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Zimbabwe peaked at 0.0015 metric tons per person in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per person, in 1960.
Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 215 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | metric tons per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1961 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1962 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1963 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1964 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1965 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1966 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1967 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1968 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1969 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1970 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1971 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1972 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1973 | 0 metric tons per person | +481.3% |
| 1974 | 0 metric tons per person | +77.5% |
| 1975 | 0 metric tons per person | +36.5% |
| 1976 | 0 metric tons per person | +25.2% |
| 1977 | 0 metric tons per person | -2.5% |
| 1978 | 0 metric tons per person | -1.4% |
| 1979 | 0 metric tons per person | +84.6% |
| 1980 | 0 metric tons per person | -5.6% |
| 1981 | 0 metric tons per person | -4.8% |
| 1982 | 0 metric tons per person | -6.4% |
| 1983 | 0 metric tons per person | +70.4% |
| 1984 | 0 metric tons per person | +1.7% |
| 1985 | 0 metric tons per person | -2.0% |
| 1986 | 0 metric tons per person | +3.6% |
| 1987 | 0 metric tons per person | +0.6% |
| 1988 | 0 metric tons per person | +2.5% |
| 1989 | 0 metric tons per person | -5.8% |
| 1990 | 0 metric tons per person | -4.5% |
| 1991 | 0 metric tons per person | -16.8% |
| 1992 | 0 metric tons per person | -4.2% |
| 1993 | 0 metric tons per person | -2.9% |
| 1994 | 0 metric tons per person | -0.1% |
| 1995 | 0 metric tons per person | +14.3% |
| 1996 | 0 metric tons per person | +11.5% |
| 1997 | 0 metric tons per person | -1.9% |
| 1998 | 0 metric tons per person | -1.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +596.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +77.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +5.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | -1.9% |
| 2003 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +15.7% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +12.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | -17.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | -1.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +0.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0004 metric tons per person | +103.5% |
| 2009 | 0.0004 metric tons per person | +0.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0004 metric tons per person | +0.8% |
| 2011 | 0.0011 metric tons per person | +173.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0012 metric tons per person | +3.6% |
| 2013 | 0.0014 metric tons per person | +23.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0015 metric tons per person | +5.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0015 metric tons per person | -2.3% |
| 2016 | 0.0015 metric tons per person | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0012 metric tons per person | -17.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0012 metric tons per person | +3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.0013 metric tons per person | +6.8% |
| 2020 | 0.0014 metric tons per person | +2.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0003 metric tons per person | -76.6% |
| 2022 | 0.0004 metric tons per person | +32.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0004 metric tons per person | +3.3% |
| 2024 | 0.0005 metric tons per person | +12.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 0.0001 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0002 metric tons per person | 0.0002 metric tons per person | 0.0004 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0012 metric tons per person | 0.0004 metric tons per person | 0.0015 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0006 metric tons per person | 0.0003 metric tons per person | 0.0014 metric tons per person | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 108 Romania 0.0005 metric tons per person compare
- 109 Greenland 0.0005 metric tons per person compare
- 110 Slovenia 0.0005 metric tons per person compare
- 112 Ukraine 0.0005 metric tons per person compare
- 113 Cameroon 0.0005 metric tons per person compare
- 114 Slovakia 0.0005 metric tons per person compare
More reference data data for Zimbabwe
- Spring temperature anomalies -0.1903 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.8086 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -0.5886 °C (2026)
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 60,892 (2025)
- Annual precipitation, annual growth rate 122.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Precipitation anomalies, annual growth rate 166.07 % change on previous year (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 5 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Zimbabwe?
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Zimbabwe was 0.0005 metric tons per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0015 metric tons per person in 2014.
- What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per person in 1960.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
- Zimbabwe ranks 111th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is down 67.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.