Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita

Greenland
0.0005 metric tons per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0005 metric tons per person
in 2024
Greenland rank
109th
Zimbabwe rank
111th

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita over time

  • Greenland
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0010.002196019922024

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.0005 metric tons per person against 0.0005 metric tons per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 metric tons per person.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Greenland ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 215 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greenland Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person
1970s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0 metric tons per person 0.0002 metric tons per person 0.0002 metric tons per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0 metric tons per person 0.0012 metric tons per person 0.0012 metric tons per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0003 metric tons per person 0.0006 metric tons per person 0.0003 metric tons per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
Greenland, at 0.0005 metric tons per person against 0.0005 metric tons per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
0 metric tons per person, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
Greenland ranks 109th and Zimbabwe ranks 111th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/greenland/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/greenland/zimbabwe/">Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,819 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.