Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil
Brazil: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita was 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil, 1960–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per person.
Analysis
The most recent figure for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil is 0.0042 metric tons per person, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 65 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.9% on the previous year and up 47.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil peaked at 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per person, in 1960.
That places Brazil 41st out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil, year by year
| Year | metric tons per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1961 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1962 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1963 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1964 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1965 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1966 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1967 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1968 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1969 | 0 metric tons per person | — |
| 1970 | 0 metric tons per person | +85.4% |
| 1971 | 0 metric tons per person | +38.7% |
| 1972 | 0 metric tons per person | +80.7% |
| 1973 | 0 metric tons per person | +81.6% |
| 1974 | 0 metric tons per person | +65.9% |
| 1975 | 0 metric tons per person | +76.8% |
| 1976 | 0 metric tons per person | +47.8% |
| 1977 | 0 metric tons per person | +75.9% |
| 1978 | 0 metric tons per person | +41.7% |
| 1979 | 0 metric tons per person | +45.5% |
| 1980 | 0 metric tons per person | +116.4% |
| 1981 | 0 metric tons per person | +51.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +28.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +18.2% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +14.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | -0.5% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | -1.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +17.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +16.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +14.6% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 metric tons per person | +10.8% |
| 1991 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +12.2% |
| 1992 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +25.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +0.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0002 metric tons per person | +0.1% |
| 1995 | 0.0003 metric tons per person | +47.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0005 metric tons per person | +65.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0005 metric tons per person | +11.2% |
| 1998 | 0.0006 metric tons per person | +16.8% |
| 1999 | 0.0008 metric tons per person | +33.4% |
| 2000 | 0.001 metric tons per person | +20.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0012 metric tons per person | +17.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0014 metric tons per person | +19.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0015 metric tons per person | +9.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0015 metric tons per person | -2.4% |
| 2005 | 0.0014 metric tons per person | -5.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0015 metric tons per person | +4.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0015 metric tons per person | +5.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0017 metric tons per person | +13.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0019 metric tons per person | +9.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0021 metric tons per person | +11.8% |
| 2011 | 0.0022 metric tons per person | +5.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0024 metric tons per person | +9.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0024 metric tons per person | -1.5% |
| 2014 | 0.0028 metric tons per person | +17.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0029 metric tons per person | +1.7% |
| 2016 | 0.0027 metric tons per person | -6.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0028 metric tons per person | +3.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0028 metric tons per person | +2.2% |
| 2019 | 0.0029 metric tons per person | +2.6% |
| 2020 | 0.003 metric tons per person | +4.4% |
| 2021 | 0.0031 metric tons per person | +2.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0035 metric tons per person | +13.2% |
| 2023 | 0.0038 metric tons per person | +6.9% |
| 2024 | 0.0042 metric tons per person | +10.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 1970s | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 metric tons per person | 0 metric tons per person | 0.0001 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0004 metric tons per person | 0.0001 metric tons per person | 0.0008 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0015 metric tons per person | 0.001 metric tons per person | 0.0019 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0026 metric tons per person | 0.0021 metric tons per person | 0.0029 metric tons per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0035 metric tons per person | 0.003 metric tons per person | 0.0042 metric tons per person | 5 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More reference data data for Brazil
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 13.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 72.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 9.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 139.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 46.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 18.99 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 405.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 699.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 49.04 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil?
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil was 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024.
- What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per person in 1960.
- How does Brazil rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 41st out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.