Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil

Brazil: Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita was 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2024)
0.0042 metric tons per person
Change on year
up 10.9%
World rank
41st
of 215 countries
All-time high
0.0042 metric tons per person
in 2024
All-time low
0 metric tons per person
in 1960
Years of data
65
1960–2024

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil, 1960–2024

00.0010.0020.0030.004196019922024

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per person.

Analysis

The most recent figure for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil is 0.0042 metric tons per person, measured in 2024. That is the highest value across all 65 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 10.9% on the previous year and up 47.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil peaked at 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0 metric tons per person, in 1960.

That places Brazil 41st out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil, year by year

Annual values for Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil, 1960 to 2024.
Year metric tons per person Change
1960 0 metric tons per person
1961 0 metric tons per person
1962 0 metric tons per person
1963 0 metric tons per person
1964 0 metric tons per person
1965 0 metric tons per person
1966 0 metric tons per person
1967 0 metric tons per person
1968 0 metric tons per person
1969 0 metric tons per person
1970 0 metric tons per person +85.4%
1971 0 metric tons per person +38.7%
1972 0 metric tons per person +80.7%
1973 0 metric tons per person +81.6%
1974 0 metric tons per person +65.9%
1975 0 metric tons per person +76.8%
1976 0 metric tons per person +47.8%
1977 0 metric tons per person +75.9%
1978 0 metric tons per person +41.7%
1979 0 metric tons per person +45.5%
1980 0 metric tons per person +116.4%
1981 0 metric tons per person +51.5%
1982 0.0001 metric tons per person +28.0%
1983 0.0001 metric tons per person +18.2%
1984 0.0001 metric tons per person +14.2%
1985 0.0001 metric tons per person -0.5%
1986 0.0001 metric tons per person -1.0%
1987 0.0001 metric tons per person +17.2%
1988 0.0001 metric tons per person +16.2%
1989 0.0001 metric tons per person +14.6%
1990 0.0001 metric tons per person +10.8%
1991 0.0002 metric tons per person +12.2%
1992 0.0002 metric tons per person +25.4%
1993 0.0002 metric tons per person +0.3%
1994 0.0002 metric tons per person +0.1%
1995 0.0003 metric tons per person +47.2%
1996 0.0005 metric tons per person +65.6%
1997 0.0005 metric tons per person +11.2%
1998 0.0006 metric tons per person +16.8%
1999 0.0008 metric tons per person +33.4%
2000 0.001 metric tons per person +20.9%
2001 0.0012 metric tons per person +17.7%
2002 0.0014 metric tons per person +19.0%
2003 0.0015 metric tons per person +9.0%
2004 0.0015 metric tons per person -2.4%
2005 0.0014 metric tons per person -5.5%
2006 0.0015 metric tons per person +4.3%
2007 0.0015 metric tons per person +5.3%
2008 0.0017 metric tons per person +13.6%
2009 0.0019 metric tons per person +9.1%
2010 0.0021 metric tons per person +11.8%
2011 0.0022 metric tons per person +5.0%
2012 0.0024 metric tons per person +9.4%
2013 0.0024 metric tons per person -1.5%
2014 0.0028 metric tons per person +17.2%
2015 0.0029 metric tons per person +1.7%
2016 0.0027 metric tons per person -6.8%
2017 0.0028 metric tons per person +3.3%
2018 0.0028 metric tons per person +2.2%
2019 0.0029 metric tons per person +2.6%
2020 0.003 metric tons per person +4.4%
2021 0.0031 metric tons per person +2.7%
2022 0.0035 metric tons per person +13.2%
2023 0.0038 metric tons per person +6.9%
2024 0.0042 metric tons per person +10.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1970s 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 10
1980s 0.0001 metric tons per person 0 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person 10
1990s 0.0004 metric tons per person 0.0001 metric tons per person 0.0008 metric tons per person 10
2000s 0.0015 metric tons per person 0.001 metric tons per person 0.0019 metric tons per person 10
2010s 0.0026 metric tons per person 0.0021 metric tons per person 0.0029 metric tons per person 10
2020s 0.0035 metric tons per person 0.003 metric tons per person 0.0042 metric tons per person 5

Countries ranked near Brazil

  1. 38 Australia 0.0043 metric tons per person compare
  2. 39 Uzbekistan 0.0043 metric tons per person compare
  3. 40 Zambia 0.0042 metric tons per person compare
  4. 42 Panama 0.004 metric tons per person compare
  5. 43 Colombia 0.004 metric tons per person compare
  6. 44 Canada 0.0039 metric tons per person compare

See the full ranking of 215 places →

More reference data data for Brazil

All data for Brazil →

Frequently asked questions

What is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil?
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil was 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Brazil?
The highest recorded value was 0.0042 metric tons per person in 2024.
What is the lowest seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita recorded in Brazil?
The lowest recorded value was 0 metric tons per person in 1960.
How does Brazil rank for seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita?
Brazil ranks 41st out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
Is seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita rising or falling in Brazil?
Over the last ten years it is up 47.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Brazil data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 65 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/brazil/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/seafood-production-wild-fish-catch-vs-aquaculture-per-capita/brazil/">Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita in Brazil</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture, per capita
Unit
metric tons per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 12,819 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Seafood production: wild fish catch vs. aquaculture divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.