Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Chile
Chile: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas was 0 people in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Chile, 2000–2024
Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in people.
Analysis
In 2024, sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Chile stood at 0 people. That is the lowest value across all 25 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Chile peaked at 249,026 people in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 people, in 2021.
That places Chile 97th out of 186 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 212,574 people | 172,348 people | 249,026 people | 10 |
| 2010s | 114,850 people | 64,972 people | 162,563 people | 10 |
| 2020s | 10,516 people | 0 people | 52,578 people | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 94 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 51.23 people compare
- 95 Cook Islands 33.8 people compare
- 96 Tonga 21.18 people compare
- 97 Afghanistan 0 people compare
- 97 Albania 0 people compare
- 97 Andorra 0 people compare
- 97 Argentina 0 people compare
- 97 Armenia 0 people compare
- 97 Austria 0 people compare
- 97 Azerbaijan 0 people compare
- 97 Bangladesh 0 people compare
- 97 Belarus 0 people compare
- 97 Belgium 0 people compare
- 97 Bermuda 0 people compare
- 97 Bhutan 0 people compare
- 97 Bolivia 0 people compare
- 97 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 people compare
- 97 Brazil 0 people compare
- 97 Bulgaria 0 people compare
- 97 Cambodia 0 people compare
- 97 Canada 0 people compare
- 97 Cayman Islands 0 people compare
- 97 China 0 people compare
- 97 Cyprus 0 people compare
- 97 Czechia 0 people compare
- 97 Denmark 0 people compare
- 97 East Timor 0 people compare
- 97 Ecuador 0 people compare
- 97 Egypt 0 people compare
- 97 Estonia 0 people compare
- 97 Falkland Islands 0 people compare
- 97 Fiji 0 people compare
- 97 Finland 0 people compare
- 97 France 0 people compare
- 97 Germany 0 people compare
- 97 Gibraltar 0 people compare
- 97 Greece 0 people compare
- 97 Hong Kong 0 people compare
- 97 Hungary 0 people compare
- 97 Iceland 0 people compare
- 97 India 0 people compare
- 97 Iran 0 people compare
- 97 Israel 0 people compare
- 97 Italy 0 people compare
- 97 Kazakhstan 0 people compare
- 97 Kuwait 0 people compare
- 97 Kyrgyzstan 0 people compare
- 97 Laos 0 people compare
- 97 Latvia 0 people compare
- 97 Lithuania 0 people compare
- 97 Macao 0 people compare
- 97 Malaysia 0 people compare
- 97 Maldives 0 people compare
- 97 Mexico 0 people compare
- 97 Moldova 0 people compare
- 97 Monaco 0 people compare
- 97 Montenegro 0 people compare
- 97 Netherlands 0 people compare
- 97 New Zealand 0 people compare
- 97 North Korea 0 people compare
- 97 North Macedonia 0 people compare
- 97 Norway 0 people compare
- 97 Oman 0 people compare
- 97 Palau 0 people compare
- 97 Palestine 0 people compare
- 97 Paraguay 0 people compare
- 97 Poland 0 people compare
- 97 Portugal 0 people compare
- 97 Romania 0 people compare
- 97 Russia 0 people compare
- 97 Saint Barthelemy 0 people compare
- 97 Saint Martin (French part) 0 people compare
- 97 Singapore 0 people compare
- 97 Slovakia 0 people compare
- 97 Spain 0 people compare
- 97 Sri Lanka 0 people compare
- 97 Sweden 0 people compare
- 97 Switzerland 0 people compare
- 97 Thailand 0 people compare
- 97 Turkmenistan 0 people compare
- 97 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 people compare
- 97 Ukraine 0 people compare
- 97 United Arab Emirates 0 people compare
- 97 United Kingdom 0 people compare
- 97 United States 0 people compare
- 97 Uruguay 0 people compare
- 97 Uzbekistan 0 people compare
- 97 Vietnam 0 people compare
- 97 Zimbabwe 0 people compare
More reference data data for Chile
- Spring temperature anomalies -0.1995 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 1.21 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month 1.32 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 0.5729 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 0.2404 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 185.48 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 1 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Chile?
- Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Chile was 0 people in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest sanitation facilities usage in urban areas recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 249,026 people in 2000.
- What is the lowest sanitation facilities usage in urban areas recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 people in 2021.
- How does Chile rank for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas?
- Chile ranks 97th out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sanitation facilities usage in urban areas rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Open defecation includes defecating in fields, forests, bushes, bodies of water or other open spaces, not using any sanitation facilities.