Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Bhutan
Bhutan: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas was 0 people in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
0 people
World rank
97th
of 186 countries
All-time high
6,618 people
in 2004
All-time low
0 people
in 2021
Years of data
25
2000–2024
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Bhutan, 2000–2024
Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in people.
Analysis
The most recent figure for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Bhutan is 0 people, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 25 years on record.
The figure is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Bhutan peaked at 6,618 people in 2004 and was at its lowest, 0 people, in 2021.
Bhutan ranks 97th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,306 people | 5,626 people | 6,618 people | 10 |
| 2010s | 3,396 people | 1,055 people | 5,318 people | 10 |
| 2020s | 82.31 people | 0 people | 411.57 people | 5 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
- 94 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 51.23 people compare
- 95 Cook Islands 33.8 people compare
- 96 Tonga 21.18 people compare
- 97 Afghanistan 0 people compare
- 97 Albania 0 people compare
- 97 Andorra 0 people compare
- 97 Argentina 0 people compare
- 97 Armenia 0 people compare
- 97 Austria 0 people compare
- 97 Azerbaijan 0 people compare
- 97 Bangladesh 0 people compare
- 97 Belarus 0 people compare
- 97 Belgium 0 people compare
- 97 Bermuda 0 people compare
- 97 Bolivia 0 people compare
- 97 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 people compare
- 97 Brazil 0 people compare
- 97 Bulgaria 0 people compare
- 97 Cambodia 0 people compare
- 97 Canada 0 people compare
- 97 Cayman Islands 0 people compare
- 97 Chile 0 people compare
- 97 China 0 people compare
- 97 Cyprus 0 people compare
- 97 Czechia 0 people compare
- 97 Denmark 0 people compare
- 97 East Timor 0 people compare
- 97 Ecuador 0 people compare
- 97 Egypt 0 people compare
- 97 Estonia 0 people compare
- 97 Falkland Islands 0 people compare
- 97 Fiji 0 people compare
- 97 Finland 0 people compare
- 97 France 0 people compare
- 97 Germany 0 people compare
- 97 Gibraltar 0 people compare
- 97 Greece 0 people compare
- 97 Hong Kong 0 people compare
- 97 Hungary 0 people compare
- 97 Iceland 0 people compare
- 97 India 0 people compare
- 97 Iran 0 people compare
- 97 Israel 0 people compare
- 97 Italy 0 people compare
- 97 Kazakhstan 0 people compare
- 97 Kuwait 0 people compare
- 97 Kyrgyzstan 0 people compare
- 97 Laos 0 people compare
- 97 Latvia 0 people compare
- 97 Lithuania 0 people compare
- 97 Macao 0 people compare
- 97 Malaysia 0 people compare
- 97 Maldives 0 people compare
- 97 Mexico 0 people compare
- 97 Moldova 0 people compare
- 97 Monaco 0 people compare
- 97 Montenegro 0 people compare
- 97 Netherlands 0 people compare
- 97 New Zealand 0 people compare
- 97 North Korea 0 people compare
- 97 North Macedonia 0 people compare
- 97 Norway 0 people compare
- 97 Oman 0 people compare
- 97 Palau 0 people compare
- 97 Palestine 0 people compare
- 97 Paraguay 0 people compare
- 97 Poland 0 people compare
- 97 Portugal 0 people compare
- 97 Romania 0 people compare
- 97 Russia 0 people compare
- 97 Saint Barthelemy 0 people compare
- 97 Saint Martin (French part) 0 people compare
- 97 Singapore 0 people compare
- 97 Slovakia 0 people compare
- 97 Spain 0 people compare
- 97 Sri Lanka 0 people compare
- 97 Sweden 0 people compare
- 97 Switzerland 0 people compare
- 97 Thailand 0 people compare
- 97 Turkmenistan 0 people compare
- 97 Turks and Caicos Islands 0 people compare
- 97 Ukraine 0 people compare
- 97 United Arab Emirates 0 people compare
- 97 United Kingdom 0 people compare
- 97 United States 0 people compare
- 97 Uruguay 0 people compare
- 97 Uzbekistan 0 people compare
- 97 Vietnam 0 people compare
- 97 Zimbabwe 0 people compare
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Spring temperature anomalies 1.97 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.6061 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month 2.67 °C (2026)
- Universal right to vote in practice 2 (2025)
- Autumn temperature anomalies 1.49 °C (2025)
- Winter temperature anomalies 2.34 °C (2025)
- Consumer price index 225.79 2010 = 100 (2025)
- Universal right to vote 2 (2025)
- Competitive elections 1 (2025)
- Men's universal right to vote 1 (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Bhutan?
- Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas in Bhutan was 0 people in 2024, according to WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest sanitation facilities usage in urban areas recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 6,618 people in 2004.
- What is the lowest sanitation facilities usage in urban areas recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 people in 2021.
- How does Bhutan rank for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas?
- Bhutan ranks 97th out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
- Is sanitation facilities usage in urban areas rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 25 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Open defecation includes defecating in fields, forests, bushes, bodies of water or other open spaces, not using any sanitation facilities.