Rule of Law Index in Latvia
Latvia: Rule of Law Index was 0.973 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Rule of Law Index in Latvia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0.973 for rule of law index in 2025. That is the highest value across all 237 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 1.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rule of law index in Latvia peaked at 0.973 in 2025 and was at its lowest, 0.049, in 1825.
Latvia ranks 15th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rule of Law Index in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 0.058 | — |
| 1790 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 0.058 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 0.049 | -15.5% |
| 1826 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 0.049 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 0.062 | +26.5% |
| 1834 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.062 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.071 | +14.5% |
| 1843 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.071 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.151 | +112.7% |
| 1856 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.151 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.164 | +8.6% |
| 1862 | 0.164 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.164 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.285 | +73.8% |
| 1865 | 0.419 | +47.0% |
| 1866 | 0.517 | +23.4% |
| 1867 | 0.517 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.538 | +4.1% |
| 1869 | 0.538 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.58 | +7.8% |
| 1871 | 0.58 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.58 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.58 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.596 | +2.8% |
| 1875 | 0.596 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.596 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.596 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.411 | -31.0% |
| 1879 | 0.411 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.411 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.342 | -16.8% |
| 1882 | 0.342 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.342 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.342 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.356 | +4.1% |
| 1886 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.356 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.304 | -14.6% |
| 1901 | 0.299 | -1.6% |
| 1902 | 0.301 | +0.7% |
| 1903 | 0.301 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.299 | -0.7% |
| 1905 | 0.275 | -8.0% |
| 1906 | 0.309 | +12.4% |
| 1907 | 0.313 | +1.3% |
| 1908 | 0.334 | +6.7% |
| 1909 | 0.34 | +1.8% |
| 1910 | 0.338 | -0.6% |
| 1911 | 0.338 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.338 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.339 | +0.3% |
| 1914 | 0.331 | -2.4% |
| 1915 | 0.319 | -3.6% |
| 1916 | 0.296 | -7.2% |
| 1917 | 0.303 | +2.4% |
| 1918 | 0.145 | -52.1% |
| 1919 | 0.123 | -15.2% |
| 1920 | 0.865 | +603.3% |
| 1921 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.865 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.828 | -4.3% |
| 1935 | 0.783 | -5.4% |
| 1936 | 0.772 | -1.4% |
| 1937 | 0.772 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.772 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.772 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.137 | -82.3% |
| 1941 | 0.138 | +0.7% |
| 1942 | 0.139 | +0.7% |
| 1943 | 0.139 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.139 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.139 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.143 | +2.9% |
| 1947 | 0.143 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.131 | -8.4% |
| 1949 | 0.131 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.126 | -3.8% |
| 1951 | 0.125 | -0.8% |
| 1952 | 0.125 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.138 | +10.4% |
| 1954 | 0.186 | +34.8% |
| 1955 | 0.186 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.195 | +4.8% |
| 1957 | 0.195 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.194 | -0.5% |
| 1959 | 0.194 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.205 | +5.7% |
| 1961 | 0.195 | -4.9% |
| 1962 | 0.195 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.195 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.17 | -12.8% |
| 1965 | 0.17 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.17 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.171 | +0.6% |
| 1968 | 0.168 | -1.8% |
| 1969 | 0.166 | -1.2% |
| 1970 | 0.159 | -4.2% |
| 1971 | 0.165 | +3.8% |
| 1972 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 0.165 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.168 | +1.8% |
| 1983 | 0.164 | -2.4% |
| 1984 | 0.164 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.17 | +3.7% |
| 1986 | 0.163 | -4.1% |
| 1987 | 0.186 | +14.1% |
| 1988 | 0.192 | +3.2% |
| 1989 | 0.194 | +1.0% |
| 1990 | 0.8 | +312.4% |
| 1991 | 0.837 | +4.6% |
| 1992 | 0.839 | +0.2% |
| 1993 | 0.85 | +1.3% |
| 1994 | 0.846 | -0.5% |
| 1995 | 0.852 | +0.7% |
| 1996 | 0.871 | +2.2% |
| 1997 | 0.878 | +0.8% |
| 1998 | 0.88 | +0.2% |
| 1999 | 0.886 | +0.7% |
| 2000 | 0.891 | +0.6% |
| 2001 | 0.891 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.897 | +0.7% |
| 2003 | 0.899 | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 0.908 | +1.0% |
| 2005 | 0.916 | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 0.91 | -0.7% |
| 2007 | 0.915 | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 0.925 | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.931 | +0.6% |
| 2010 | 0.948 | +1.8% |
| 2011 | 0.948 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.954 | +0.6% |
| 2013 | 0.955 | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 0.956 | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 0.956 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.944 | -1.3% |
| 2017 | 0.947 | +0.3% |
| 2018 | 0.951 | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 0.955 | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 0.955 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.968 | +1.4% |
| 2022 | 0.968 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.967 | -0.1% |
| 2024 | 0.972 | +0.5% |
| 2025 | 0.973 | +0.1% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.973 is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.927, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.973 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.8365, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 1 |
| 1790s | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 10 |
| 1820s | 0.0535 | 0.049 | 0.058 | 10 |
| 1830s | 0.0581 | 0.049 | 0.062 | 10 |
| 1840s | 0.0692 | 0.062 | 0.071 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.111 | 0.071 | 0.151 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.3457 | 0.151 | 0.538 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.5526 | 0.411 | 0.596 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.3559 | 0.342 | 0.411 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.356 | 0.356 | 0.356 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.3075 | 0.275 | 0.34 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.287 | 0.123 | 0.339 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.865 | 0.865 | 0.865 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.8159 | 0.772 | 0.865 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.1379 | 0.131 | 0.143 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.1664 | 0.125 | 0.195 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.1805 | 0.166 | 0.205 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.1644 | 0.159 | 0.165 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1731 | 0.163 | 0.194 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.8539 | 0.8 | 0.886 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.9083 | 0.891 | 0.931 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.9514 | 0.944 | 0.956 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9672 | 0.955 | 0.973 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 12 Luxembourg 0.979 compare
- 13 Seychelles 0.976 compare
- 14 Singapore 0.974 compare
- 16 Netherlands 0.969 compare
- 17 France 0.967 compare
- 18 Belgium 0.964 compare
More reference data data for Latvia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.128 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0673 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.4657 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4291 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2986 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rule of law index in Latvia?
- Rule of law index in Latvia was 0.973 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rule of law index recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.973 in 2025.
- What is the lowest rule of law index recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.049 in 1825.
- How does Latvia rank for rule of law index?
- Latvia ranks 15th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rule of law index rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rule of Law Index. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which the government complies with the law, courts are independent, laws transparent, justice accessible, corruption absent, and the bureaucracy is impartial.