Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Rigorous and impartial public administration score was -0.524 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan is -0.524, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 50.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan peaked at -0.21 in 2021 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1950.
Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 237 years of available data.
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.36 | — |
| 1790 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -2.2 | +61.4% |
| 1922 | -1.73 | -21.3% |
| 1923 | -1.32 | -23.8% |
| 1924 | -1.53 | +15.7% |
| 1925 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.46 | -4.7% |
| 1929 | -1.46 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.65 | +13.0% |
| 1931 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.86 | +12.6% |
| 1935 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.66 | -10.5% |
| 1941 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.86 | +12.2% |
| 1949 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.28 | +22.4% |
| 1951 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.02 | -11.6% |
| 1954 | -1.36 | -32.5% |
| 1955 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.21 | -11.3% |
| 1957 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1970 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.21 | -11.8% |
| 1972 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1984 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -11.1% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | +3.5% |
| 1987 | -1.08 | -14.7% |
| 1988 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.955 | -11.9% |
| 1991 | -0.955 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.955 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -1.18 | +23.4% |
| 1994 | -1.34 | +14.2% |
| 1995 | -1.34 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -1.34 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -1.5 | +11.2% |
| 1998 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -1.09 | -26.9% |
| 2006 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -1.05 | -3.9% |
| 2014 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.65 | -38.2% |
| 2018 | -0.443 | -31.8% |
| 2019 | -0.264 | -40.4% |
| 2020 | -0.264 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -0.21 | -20.5% |
| 2022 | -0.21 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -0.21 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.524 | +149.5% |
| 2025 | -0.524 | -0.0% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's -0.524 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.1905, 2.8× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's -0.524 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.57 | -2.2 | -1.32 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.77 | -1.86 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.7 | -1.86 | -1.66 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.64 | -2.28 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.23 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.26 | -1.5 | -0.955 | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.3 | -1.5 | -1.09 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.8843 | -1.09 | -0.264 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.3237 | -0.524 | -0.21 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan was -0.524 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.21 in 2021.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1950.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Uzbekistan ranks 122nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and impartial public administration score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).