Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.524 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Latest (2025)
-0.524
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
122nd
of 176 countries
All-time high
-0.21
in 2021
All-time low
-2.28
in 1950
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Uzbekistan, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan is -0.524, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 50.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan peaked at -0.21 in 2021 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1950.
Uzbekistan ranks 122nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 237 years of available data.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.36 | — |
| 1790 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -2.2 | +61.4% |
| 1922 | -1.73 | -21.3% |
| 1923 | -1.32 | -23.8% |
| 1924 | -1.53 | +15.7% |
| 1925 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.46 | -4.7% |
| 1929 | -1.46 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.65 | +13.0% |
| 1931 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.86 | +12.6% |
| 1935 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.66 | -10.5% |
| 1941 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.86 | +12.2% |
| 1949 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.28 | +22.4% |
| 1951 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.02 | -11.6% |
| 1954 | -1.36 | -32.5% |
| 1955 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.21 | -11.3% |
| 1957 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1970 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.21 | -11.8% |
| 1972 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1984 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -11.1% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | +3.5% |
| 1987 | -1.08 | -14.7% |
| 1988 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.955 | -11.9% |
| 1991 | -0.955 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.955 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -1.18 | +23.4% |
| 1994 | -1.34 | +14.2% |
| 1995 | -1.34 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -1.34 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -1.5 | +11.2% |
| 1998 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2001 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -1.5 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -1.09 | -26.9% |
| 2006 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -1.05 | -3.9% |
| 2014 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.65 | -38.2% |
| 2018 | -0.443 | -31.8% |
| 2019 | -0.264 | -40.4% |
| 2020 | -0.264 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -0.21 | -20.5% |
| 2022 | -0.21 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -0.21 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -0.524 | +149.5% |
| 2025 | -0.524 | -0.0% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's -0.524 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.1905, 2.8× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's -0.524 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.36 | -1.36 | -1.36 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.57 | -2.2 | -1.32 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.77 | -1.86 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.7 | -1.86 | -1.66 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.64 | -2.28 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.23 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.26 | -1.5 | -0.955 | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.3 | -1.5 | -1.09 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.8843 | -1.09 | -0.264 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.3237 | -0.524 | -0.21 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More reference data data for Uzbekistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.19 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2736 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.78 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 41.77 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.49 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Uzbekistan was -0.524 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.21 in 2021.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1950.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Uzbekistan ranks 122nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.