Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Belarus
Belarus: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -0.478 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-0.478
Change on year
up 64.7%
World rank
121st
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.39
in 1870
All-time low
-2.28
in 1950
Years of data
231
1795–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Belarus, 1795–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Belarus recorded -0.478 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025.
That represents a change of up 64.7% on the previous year and down 271.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Belarus peaked at 1.39 in 1870 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1950.
That places Belarus 121st out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1795 | -1.87 | — |
| 1796 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.582 | -68.8% |
| 1856 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.377 | -164.8% |
| 1866 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1.39 | +269.0% |
| 1871 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.383 | -72.5% |
| 1879 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.308 | -180.4% |
| 1882 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.448 | +45.5% |
| 1906 | -0.322 | -28.1% |
| 1907 | -0.246 | -23.6% |
| 1908 | -0.108 | -56.1% |
| 1909 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.178 | +64.8% |
| 1914 | -0.178 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.304 | +70.8% |
| 1916 | -0.304 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.096 | -68.4% |
| 1918 | -1.8 | +1780.2% |
| 1919 | -2.26 | +25.1% |
| 1920 | -2.2 | -2.4% |
| 1921 | -2.2 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -1.73 | -21.3% |
| 1923 | -1.32 | -23.8% |
| 1924 | -1.53 | +15.7% |
| 1925 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.53 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.46 | -4.7% |
| 1929 | -1.46 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.65 | +13.0% |
| 1931 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.65 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.86 | +12.6% |
| 1935 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.66 | -10.5% |
| 1941 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.86 | +12.2% |
| 1949 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.28 | +22.4% |
| 1951 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.02 | -11.6% |
| 1954 | -1.36 | -32.5% |
| 1955 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.21 | -11.3% |
| 1957 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1970 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.21 | -11.8% |
| 1972 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1984 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -11.1% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | +3.5% |
| 1987 | -1.08 | -14.7% |
| 1988 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.568 | -152.4% |
| 1991 | 0.568 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.38 | +143.3% |
| 1993 | 1.38 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.25 | -9.9% |
| 1995 | 0.918 | -26.3% |
| 1996 | 0.145 | -84.2% |
| 1997 | 0.145 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.145 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.145 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.145 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.358 | +146.9% |
| 2002 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.358 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.278 | -22.3% |
| 2014 | 0.278 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.278 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.348 | +25.2% |
| 2017 | 0.348 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.348 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.348 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | -0.865 | -348.6% |
| 2021 | -1.55 | +78.8% |
| 2022 | -1.35 | -12.5% |
| 2023 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -1.35 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | -0.478 | -64.7% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's -0.478 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755. (48 countries reporting)
- Belarus's -0.478 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 5 |
| 1800s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.23 | -1.87 | -0.582 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.1025 | -0.582 | 0.377 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.19 | 0.383 | 1.39 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.2389 | -0.308 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.308 | -0.308 | -0.308 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.2772 | -0.448 | -0.108 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.5447 | -2.26 | -0.096 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.65 | -2.2 | -1.32 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.77 | -1.86 | -1.65 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.7 | -1.86 | -1.66 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.64 | -2.28 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.23 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6643 | 0.145 | 1.38 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.3367 | 0.145 | 0.358 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.33 | 0.278 | 0.358 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.16 | -1.55 | -0.478 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More reference data data for Belarus
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3462 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3596 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 24.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.96 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Belarus?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Belarus was -0.478 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 1.39 in 1870.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1950.
- How does Belarus rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Belarus ranks 121st out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 271.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 231 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.