Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan
Taiwan: Rigorous and impartial public administration score was 3.25 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
3.25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 176 countries
All-time high
3.25
in 2023
All-time low
-2.32
in 1789
Years of data
232
1789–2025
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan stood at 3.25. That is the highest value across all 232 years on record.
The figure is up 105.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan peaked at 3.25 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -2.32, in 1789.
Taiwan ranks 6th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.32 | — |
| 1790 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.729 | -68.5% |
| 1901 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -0.491 | -32.6% |
| 1921 | -0.182 | -62.9% |
| 1922 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -0.477 | +162.1% |
| 1939 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.52 | +9.0% |
| 1946 | -0.467 | -10.2% |
| 1947 | -0.467 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.819 | +75.4% |
| 1949 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.538 | -34.3% |
| 1954 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.316 | -41.3% |
| 1962 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.079 | -75.0% |
| 1974 | -0.079 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.079 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.326 | -512.7% |
| 1977 | 0.326 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.288 | -188.3% |
| 1979 | -0.288 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.288 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.288 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.316 | -209.7% |
| 1983 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 1.19 | +277.5% |
| 1990 | 1.46 | +22.0% |
| 1991 | 1.69 | +15.9% |
| 1992 | 2.1 | +24.3% |
| 1993 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.15 | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.74 | -19.4% |
| 2010 | 1.74 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.74 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.74 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.34 | -23.0% |
| 2014 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.58 | +18.0% |
| 2016 | 1.78 | +12.9% |
| 2017 | 2.2 | +23.8% |
| 2018 | 2.2 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.2 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.63 | +19.4% |
| 2021 | 2.63 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.63 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.25 | +23.3% |
| 2024 | 3.25 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.25 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1830s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1850s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1860s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1870s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1890s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 5 |
| 1900s | -0.729 | -0.729 | -0.729 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.729 | -0.729 | -0.729 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.2129 | -0.491 | -0.182 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.241 | -0.477 | -0.182 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.5477 | -0.819 | -0.467 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.6223 | -0.819 | -0.538 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.3382 | -0.538 | -0.316 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.1109 | -0.316 | 0.326 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2829 | -0.288 | 1.19 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.99 | 1.46 | 2.1 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.11 | 1.74 | 2.15 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.78 | 1.34 | 2.2 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.94 | 2.63 | 3.25 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Taiwan
More reference data data for Taiwan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0139 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3236 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.16 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4506 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0594 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 306.1 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan was 3.25 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Taiwan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.25 in 2023.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Taiwan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.32 in 1789.
- How does Taiwan rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Taiwan ranks 6th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Taiwan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 105.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Taiwan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and impartial public administration score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 232 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).