Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Taiwan
Taiwan: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 3.25 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
3.25
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
6th
of 176 countries
All-time high
3.25
in 2023
All-time low
-2.32
in 1789
Years of data
232
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Taiwan, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan stood at 3.25. That is the highest value across all 232 years on record.
The figure is up 105.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan peaked at 3.25 in 2023 and was at its lowest, -2.32, in 1789.
Taiwan ranks 6th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Taiwan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.32 | — |
| 1790 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.729 | -68.5% |
| 1901 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -0.729 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -0.491 | -32.6% |
| 1921 | -0.182 | -62.9% |
| 1922 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -0.182 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -0.477 | +162.1% |
| 1939 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.477 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.52 | +9.0% |
| 1946 | -0.467 | -10.2% |
| 1947 | -0.467 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.819 | +75.4% |
| 1949 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.538 | -34.3% |
| 1954 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.538 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.316 | -41.3% |
| 1962 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.316 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.079 | -75.0% |
| 1974 | -0.079 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.079 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | 0.326 | -512.7% |
| 1977 | 0.326 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.288 | -188.3% |
| 1979 | -0.288 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.288 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.288 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | 0.316 | -209.7% |
| 1983 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.316 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 1.19 | +277.5% |
| 1990 | 1.46 | +22.0% |
| 1991 | 1.69 | +15.9% |
| 1992 | 2.1 | +24.3% |
| 1993 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.15 | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.15 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.74 | -19.4% |
| 2010 | 1.74 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.74 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.74 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.34 | -23.0% |
| 2014 | 1.34 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.58 | +18.0% |
| 2016 | 1.78 | +12.9% |
| 2017 | 2.2 | +23.8% |
| 2018 | 2.2 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.2 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.63 | +19.4% |
| 2021 | 2.63 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.63 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.25 | +23.3% |
| 2024 | 3.25 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.25 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1830s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1850s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1860s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1870s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1890s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 5 |
| 1900s | -0.729 | -0.729 | -0.729 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.729 | -0.729 | -0.729 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.2129 | -0.491 | -0.182 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.241 | -0.477 | -0.182 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.5477 | -0.819 | -0.467 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.6223 | -0.819 | -0.538 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.3382 | -0.538 | -0.316 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.1109 | -0.316 | 0.326 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2829 | -0.288 | 1.19 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.99 | 1.46 | 2.1 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.11 | 1.74 | 2.15 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.78 | 1.34 | 2.2 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.94 | 2.63 | 3.25 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Taiwan
More reference data data for Taiwan
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,323 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 111.86 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 46.04 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.84 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0594 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4506 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.6 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on 360.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural 2,013 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Taiwan was 3.25 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Taiwan?
- The highest recorded value was 3.25 in 2023.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Taiwan?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.32 in 1789.
- How does Taiwan rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Taiwan ranks 6th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Taiwan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 105.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Taiwan data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 232 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.