Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Czechia
Czechia: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 3.24 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
3.24
Change on year
up 24.5%
World rank
7th
of 176 countries
All-time high
3.24
in 2025
All-time low
-3.16
in 1940
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Czechia, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Czechia recorded 3.24 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025. That is the highest value across all 237 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 24.5% on the previous year and up 63.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Czechia peaked at 3.24 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -3.16, in 1940.
Czechia ranks 7th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Czechia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | 1.22 | — |
| 1790 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1791 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1792 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1793 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1799 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1800 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1801 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1802 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1803 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1804 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1805 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1806 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1807 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1808 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1809 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1810 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1811 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1812 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1813 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1814 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1815 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1816 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1817 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1818 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1819 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1820 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1821 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1822 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1823 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1824 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1825 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1826 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1827 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1828 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1829 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1830 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1831 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1832 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1833 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1834 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1835 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1836 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1837 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1838 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1839 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 1.22 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 2.08 | +70.3% |
| 1919 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 2.08 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 1.83 | -11.8% |
| 1939 | -0.731 | -139.9% |
| 1940 | -3.16 | +332.8% |
| 1941 | -3.16 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -3.16 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -3.16 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -3.16 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.753 | -76.2% |
| 1946 | 0.038 | -105.0% |
| 1947 | 0.038 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.16 | -3142.1% |
| 1949 | -1.29 | +12.0% |
| 1950 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -1.17 | -9.7% |
| 1955 | -1.17 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.818 | -30.1% |
| 1957 | -0.702 | -14.2% |
| 1958 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -0.702 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -0.403 | -42.6% |
| 1990 | 1.57 | -490.3% |
| 1991 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.82 | +15.8% |
| 2006 | 1.93 | +6.2% |
| 2007 | 1.93 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.93 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.93 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.93 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.93 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.93 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.93 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 1.98 | +2.5% |
| 2015 | 1.98 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.98 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.67 | -15.6% |
| 2018 | 1.67 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.88 | +12.7% |
| 2020 | 1.28 | -32.1% |
| 2021 | 1.28 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.6 | +103.7% |
| 2023 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.6 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.24 | +24.5% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 3.24 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.58, 2.1× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 3.24 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15, 2.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1 |
| 1790s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1800s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1810s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1820s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1830s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1840s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1850s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1880s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1890s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1900s | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.39 | 1.22 | 2.08 | 10 |
| 1920s | 2.08 | 2.08 | 2.08 | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.77 | -0.731 | 2.08 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.89 | -3.16 | 0.038 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.04 | -1.29 | -0.702 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.702 | -0.702 | -0.702 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.702 | -0.702 | -0.702 | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.6721 | -0.702 | -0.403 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.57 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.74 | 1.57 | 1.93 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.89 | 1.67 | 1.98 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.27 | 1.28 | 3.24 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
More reference data data for Czechia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1071 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5681 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Czechia?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Czechia was 3.24 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 3.24 in 2025.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.16 in 1940.
- How does Czechia rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Czechia ranks 7th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 63.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.