Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in New Zealand
New Zealand: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 2.69 in 2025. ▬ Flat
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in New Zealand, 1853–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in New Zealand stood at 2.69.
That represents a change of down 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in New Zealand peaked at 2.88 in 1853 and was at its lowest, 2.24, in 2021.
That places New Zealand 15th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1853 | 2.88 | — |
| 1854 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1949 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.88 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.24 | -22.4% |
| 2022 | 2.24 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.69 | +20.5% |
| 2024 | 2.69 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.69 | +0.0% |
New Zealand compared with similar countries
- New Zealand's 2.69 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.58, 1.7× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- New Zealand's 2.69 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.116, 23.2× the median. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 7 |
| 1860s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1870s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1880s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1900s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1920s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1940s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1950s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.88 | 2.88 | 2.88 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.57 | 2.24 | 2.88 | 6 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
- 12 Belgium 2.85 compare
- 13 Namibia 2.73 compare
- 14 Finland 2.71 compare
- 16 Seychelles 2.65 compare
- 17 Costa Rica 2.65 compare
- 18 South Korea 2.57 compare
More reference data data for New Zealand
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4532 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0459 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 10.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 42.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2499 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in New Zealand?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in New Zealand was 2.69 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 2.88 in 1853.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.24 in 2021.
- How does New Zealand rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- New Zealand ranks 15th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.