Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 2.65 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Costa Rica, 1838–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 2.65 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025. That is the highest value across all 188 years on record.
That represents a change of up 9.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Costa Rica peaked at 2.65 in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.085, in 1917.
Costa Rica ranks 17th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1838 | 0.389 | — |
| 1839 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1840 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1841 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1844 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1845 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1846 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1849 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1850 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1851 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1852 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1854 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1855 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1856 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1857 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1859 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1861 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1862 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1863 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.389 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.391 | +0.5% |
| 1871 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1887 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1888 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1892 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.391 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.085 | -78.3% |
| 1918 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.085 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.621 | +630.6% |
| 1921 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1943 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1944 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1945 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1947 | 0.621 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.417 | -32.9% |
| 1949 | 0.947 | +127.1% |
| 1950 | 1.63 | +71.7% |
| 1951 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 1.63 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 2.1 | +29.5% |
| 1961 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1974 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1977 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1979 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1982 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1984 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 2.1 | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 2.63 | +24.9% |
| 1991 | 2.5 | -4.8% |
| 1992 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2.5 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2.17 | -13.4% |
| 2014 | 2.35 | +8.7% |
| 2015 | 2.43 | +3.0% |
| 2016 | 2.45 | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 2.65 | +7.8% |
| 2018 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 2.65 | +0.0% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 2.65 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.58, 1.7× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 2.65 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519, 5.1× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0.389 | 0.389 | 0.389 | 2 |
| 1840s | 0.389 | 0.389 | 0.389 | 10 |
| 1850s | 0.389 | 0.389 | 0.389 | 10 |
| 1860s | 0.389 | 0.389 | 0.389 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.391 | 0.391 | 0.391 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.391 | 0.391 | 0.391 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.391 | 0.391 | 0.391 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.391 | 0.391 | 0.391 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.2992 | 0.085 | 0.391 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.621 | 0.621 | 0.621 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.621 | 0.621 | 0.621 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6332 | 0.417 | 0.947 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.63 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.52 | 2.5 | 2.63 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.48 | 2.17 | 2.65 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.65 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 14 Finland 2.71 compare
- 15 New Zealand 2.69 compare
- 16 Seychelles 2.65 compare
- 18 South Korea 2.57 compare
- 19 France 2.5 compare
- 20 Norway 2.49 compare
More reference data data for Costa Rica
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2987 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.406 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.3161 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.91 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0907 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Costa Rica?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Costa Rica was 2.65 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 2.65 in 2017.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.085 in 1917.
- How does Costa Rica rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Costa Rica ranks 17th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 188 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.