Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Myanmar
Myanmar: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -1.6 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Myanmar, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Myanmar is -1.6, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 14,445.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Myanmar peaked at 0.955 in 1959 and was at its lowest, -2.38, in 1988.
Myanmar ranks 155th of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Myanmar, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.719 | — |
| 1790 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.719 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | 0.604 | -184.0% |
| 1867 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1871 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1882 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1884 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1885 | 0.604 | +0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.715 | -218.4% |
| 1887 | -0.715 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.715 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.715 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.715 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | 0.895 | -225.2% |
| 1892 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1893 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1894 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1895 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1896 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1898 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1900 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1901 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1902 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1903 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1904 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1906 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1907 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1908 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1910 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1911 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1912 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1913 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1916 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1941 | 0.895 | +0.0% |
| 1942 | -0.479 | -153.5% |
| 1943 | -0.479 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.479 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -0.479 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | 0.805 | -268.1% |
| 1947 | 0.805 | +0.0% |
| 1948 | 0.754 | -6.3% |
| 1949 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1950 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1951 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1952 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1953 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1954 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1955 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1956 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1957 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1958 | 0.754 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.955 | +26.7% |
| 1960 | 0.955 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.753 | -21.2% |
| 1962 | -0.945 | -225.5% |
| 1963 | -1.3 | +38.1% |
| 1964 | -2.31 | +76.6% |
| 1965 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -2.38 | +3.3% |
| 1989 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -2.38 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -2.08 | -12.8% |
| 2001 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -2.08 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -1.8 | -13.4% |
| 2010 | -1.1 | -39.0% |
| 2011 | -0.585 | -46.7% |
| 2012 | -0.459 | -21.5% |
| 2013 | -0.335 | -27.0% |
| 2014 | -0.267 | -20.3% |
| 2015 | -0.011 | -95.9% |
| 2016 | 0.275 | -2600.0% |
| 2017 | 0.491 | +78.5% |
| 2018 | 0.359 | -26.9% |
| 2019 | 0.518 | +44.3% |
| 2020 | 0.533 | +2.9% |
| 2021 | -1.6 | -400.2% |
| 2022 | -1.6 | -0.0% |
| 2023 | -1.6 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -1.6 | -0.0% |
| 2025 | -1.6 | -0.0% |
Myanmar compared with similar countries
- Myanmar's -1.6 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.1905, 8.4× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Myanmar's -1.6 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.116. (22 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 10 |
| 1800s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 10 |
| 1810s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.719 | -0.719 | -0.719 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.1898 | -0.719 | 0.604 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.604 | 0.604 | 0.604 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.0764 | -0.715 | 0.604 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.734 | -0.715 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.895 | 0.895 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.895 | 0.895 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.895 | 0.895 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.895 | 0.895 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.2992 | -0.479 | 0.895 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.7741 | 0.754 | 0.955 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.44 | -2.31 | 0.955 | 10 |
| 1970s | -2.31 | -2.31 | -2.31 | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.32 | -2.38 | -2.31 | 10 |
| 1990s | -2.38 | -2.38 | -2.38 | 10 |
| 2000s | -2.05 | -2.08 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.1111 | -1.1 | 0.518 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.24 | -1.6 | 0.533 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Myanmar
More reference data data for Myanmar
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.28 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 11.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 19.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 73.24 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.8 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Myanmar?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Myanmar was -1.6 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Myanmar?
- The highest recorded value was 0.955 in 1959.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Myanmar?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.38 in 1988.
- How does Myanmar rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Myanmar ranks 155th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Myanmar?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14,445.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Myanmar data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.