Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Haiti
Haiti: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was -1.29 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
-1.29
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
152nd
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.3
in 1995
All-time low
-3.3
in 1958
Years of data
237
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Haiti, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Haiti is -1.29, measured in 2025.
The figure is down 48.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Haiti peaked at 1.3 in 1995 and was at its lowest, -3.3, in 1958.
Haiti ranks 152nd of 176 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Haiti, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -0.835 | — |
| 1790 | -0.835 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -0.835 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | 0.168 | -120.1% |
| 1793 | 0.168 | +0.0% |
| 1794 | 0.168 | +0.0% |
| 1795 | 0.168 | +0.0% |
| 1796 | 0.168 | +0.0% |
| 1797 | 0.168 | +0.0% |
| 1798 | -0.832 | -595.2% |
| 1799 | -0.832 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -0.832 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -0.832 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.45 | +194.2% |
| 1803 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.45 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -0.819 | -66.5% |
| 1822 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.41 | +194.6% |
| 1849 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -2.41 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.532 | -78.0% |
| 1861 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.532 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.72 | +35.3% |
| 1913 | -0.72 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.72 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | 0.047 | -106.5% |
| 1916 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1919 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1920 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1921 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1923 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1924 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1927 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1928 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.047 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.09 | -2421.3% |
| 1936 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1941 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.09 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -0.842 | -22.8% |
| 1948 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1955 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.842 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -2.76 | +227.4% |
| 1958 | -3.3 | +19.6% |
| 1959 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1986 | -3.3 | -0.0% |
| 1987 | -1.63 | -50.5% |
| 1988 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.63 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -1.6 | -1.8% |
| 1991 | -0.003 | -99.8% |
| 1992 | -2.06 | +68666.7% |
| 1993 | -2.06 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -1.89 | -8.2% |
| 1995 | 1.3 | -168.9% |
| 1996 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.23 | -6.0% |
| 2001 | 0.624 | -49.1% |
| 2002 | 0.624 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.624 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.318 | -49.0% |
| 2005 | -1.04 | -427.0% |
| 2006 | -0.914 | -12.1% |
| 2007 | -0.75 | -17.9% |
| 2008 | -0.75 | -0.0% |
| 2009 | -0.75 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.75 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.679 | -9.5% |
| 2012 | -0.679 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.869 | +28.0% |
| 2014 | -0.869 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.869 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.619 | -28.8% |
| 2017 | -0.863 | +39.4% |
| 2018 | -0.873 | +1.2% |
| 2019 | -1.22 | +39.2% |
| 2020 | -1.22 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -1.55 | +27.3% |
| 2022 | -1.92 | +24.4% |
| 2023 | -1.92 | -0.0% |
| 2024 | -1.29 | -32.7% |
| 2025 | -1.29 | -0.0% |
Haiti compared with similar countries
- Haiti's -1.29 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.1905, 6.8× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Haiti's -1.29 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -0.835 | -0.835 | -0.835 | 1 |
| 1790s | -0.2326 | -0.835 | 0.168 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.12 | -2.45 | -0.832 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.45 | -2.45 | -2.45 | 10 |
| 1820s | -0.9819 | -2.45 | -0.819 | 10 |
| 1830s | -0.819 | -0.819 | -0.819 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.14 | -2.41 | -0.819 | 10 |
| 1850s | -2.41 | -2.41 | -2.41 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.532 | -0.532 | -0.532 | 10 |
| 1870s | -0.532 | -0.532 | -0.532 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.532 | -0.532 | -0.532 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.532 | -0.532 | -0.532 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.532 | -0.532 | -0.532 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.2989 | -0.72 | 0.047 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.047 | 0.047 | 0.047 | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.522 | -1.09 | 0.047 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.02 | -1.09 | -0.842 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.52 | -3.3 | -0.842 | 10 |
| 1960s | -3.3 | -3.3 | -3.3 | 10 |
| 1970s | -3.3 | -3.3 | -3.3 | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.8 | -3.3 | -1.63 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.1099 | -2.06 | 1.3 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.0787 | -1.04 | 1.23 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.8285 | -1.22 | -0.619 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.53 | -1.92 | -1.22 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Haiti
- 149 Mozambique -1.21 compare
- 150 Burundi -1.25 compare
- 151 Guinea-Bissau -1.25 compare
- 153 El Salvador -1.33 compare
- 154 Pakistan -1.34 compare
- 155 Myanmar -1.6 compare
More reference data data for Haiti
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2934 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0485 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.35 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9837 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6522 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.73 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2643 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Haiti?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Haiti was -1.29 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Haiti?
- The highest recorded value was 1.3 in 1995.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Haiti?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.3 in 1958.
- How does Haiti rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Haiti ranks 152nd out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Haiti?
- Over the last ten years it is down 48.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Haiti data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 237 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.