Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Moldova
Moldova: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 0.711 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.711
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
69th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.39
in 1870
All-time low
-2.28
in 1950
Years of data
217
1789–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Moldova, 1789–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Moldova stood at 0.711.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 47.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Moldova peaked at 1.39 in 1870 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1950.
Moldova ranks 69th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Moldova, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -1.87 | — |
| 1790 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.582 | -68.8% |
| 1856 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.377 | -164.8% |
| 1866 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1.39 | +269.0% |
| 1871 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.383 | -72.5% |
| 1879 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.308 | -180.4% |
| 1882 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.448 | +45.5% |
| 1906 | -0.322 | -28.1% |
| 1907 | -0.246 | -23.6% |
| 1908 | -0.108 | -56.1% |
| 1909 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.178 | +64.8% |
| 1914 | -0.178 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.304 | +70.8% |
| 1916 | -0.304 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.096 | -68.4% |
| 1918 | -1.8 | +1780.2% |
| 1919 | -2.26 | +25.1% |
| 1940 | -1.66 | -26.4% |
| 1941 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.86 | +12.2% |
| 1949 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.28 | +22.4% |
| 1951 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.02 | -11.6% |
| 1954 | -1.36 | -32.5% |
| 1955 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.21 | -11.3% |
| 1957 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1970 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.21 | -11.8% |
| 1972 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1984 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -11.1% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | +3.5% |
| 1987 | -1.08 | -14.7% |
| 1988 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -0.083 | -92.3% |
| 1991 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1995 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1997 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.083 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.342 | -512.0% |
| 2000 | 0.342 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.016 | -95.3% |
| 2002 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.016 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.005 | -68.8% |
| 2010 | 0.668 | +13260.0% |
| 2011 | 0.668 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.668 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.424 | -36.5% |
| 2014 | 0.424 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 0.483 | +13.9% |
| 2016 | 0.128 | -73.5% |
| 2017 | 0.128 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.267 | +108.6% |
| 2019 | 0.429 | +60.7% |
| 2020 | 0.648 | +51.0% |
| 2021 | 0.648 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.02 | +57.4% |
| 2023 | 1.02 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 0.711 | -30.3% |
| 2025 | 0.711 | +0.0% |
Moldova compared with similar countries
- Moldova's 0.711 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755, 9.4× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Moldova's 0.711 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15, 62% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 1 |
| 1790s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1800s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.23 | -1.87 | -0.582 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.1025 | -0.582 | 0.377 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.19 | 0.383 | 1.39 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.2389 | -0.308 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.308 | -0.308 | -0.308 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.2772 | -0.448 | -0.108 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.5447 | -2.26 | -0.096 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.7 | -1.86 | -1.66 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.64 | -2.28 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.23 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.0405 | -0.083 | 0.342 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0475 | 0.005 | 0.342 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.4287 | 0.128 | 0.668 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.793 | 0.648 | 1.02 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Moldova
- 66 Lesotho 0.753 compare
- 67 East Timor 0.745 compare
- 68 Trinidad and Tobago 0.743 compare
- 70 Guatemala 0.66 compare
- 71 Cape Verde 0.651 compare
- 72 Nepal 0.65 compare
More reference data data for Moldova
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2466 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1366 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.118 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.6117 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8268 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4303 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5193 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6426 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Moldova?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Moldova was 0.711 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 1.39 in 1870.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1950.
- How does Moldova rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Moldova ranks 69th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is up 47.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 217 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.