Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Guatemala
Guatemala: Rigorous and impartial public administration score was 0.66 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.66
Change on year
up 735.4%
World rank
70th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.66
in 2025
All-time low
-2.98
in 1979
Years of data
236
1789–2025
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Guatemala, 1789–2025
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for rigorous and impartial public administration score in Guatemala is 0.66, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 236 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 735.4% on the previous year and up 383.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Guatemala peaked at 0.66 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -2.98, in 1979.
Guatemala ranks 70th of 176 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1789 | -2.19 | — |
| 1790 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1791 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1792 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1793 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1794 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1795 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1796 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -2.18 | -0.3% |
| 1824 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.18 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -0.819 | -62.5% |
| 1841 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1856 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -0.819 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -2.19 | +167.8% |
| 1872 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -2.19 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -2.24 | +2.2% |
| 1900 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1906 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1907 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1908 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1909 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1918 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1919 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -1.71 | -23.6% |
| 1921 | -1.21 | -29.5% |
| 1922 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1928 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1929 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.55 | +28.4% |
| 1932 | -1.51 | -2.3% |
| 1933 | -1.51 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.51 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.51 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.66 | +9.8% |
| 1937 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.8 | +8.2% |
| 1941 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.8 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -0.218 | -87.9% |
| 1945 | 0.511 | -334.4% |
| 1946 | -0.25 | -148.9% |
| 1947 | -0.25 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -0.25 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -0.25 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -0.25 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -0.25 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -0.285 | +14.0% |
| 1953 | -0.285 | -0.0% |
| 1954 | -0.682 | +139.3% |
| 1955 | -2.77 | +306.3% |
| 1956 | -2.77 | -0.0% |
| 1957 | -2.77 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -2.66 | -4.0% |
| 1959 | -2.64 | -0.8% |
| 1960 | -2.64 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -2.64 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -2.64 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -2.64 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -2.64 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -2.64 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -2.55 | -3.3% |
| 1967 | -1.88 | -26.3% |
| 1968 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.88 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -1.98 | +5.2% |
| 1971 | -2.07 | +4.8% |
| 1972 | -2.07 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -2.07 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -2.58 | +24.7% |
| 1975 | -2.42 | -6.5% |
| 1976 | -2.42 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -2.66 | +10.0% |
| 1978 | -2.82 | +6.2% |
| 1979 | -2.98 | +5.7% |
| 1980 | -2.98 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -2.98 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -2.98 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -2.9 | -2.7% |
| 1984 | -2.79 | -4.1% |
| 1985 | -2.04 | -26.8% |
| 1986 | -1.91 | -6.1% |
| 1987 | -1.16 | -39.6% |
| 1988 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | -1.16 | -0.0% |
| 1991 | -1.24 | +7.1% |
| 1992 | -1.24 | -0.0% |
| 1993 | -1.13 | -8.5% |
| 1994 | -1.05 | -7.6% |
| 1995 | -1.05 | -0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.87 | -16.9% |
| 1997 | -0.87 | -0.0% |
| 1998 | -0.87 | -0.0% |
| 1999 | -0.87 | -0.0% |
| 2000 | -0.318 | -63.4% |
| 2001 | -0.318 | -0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.318 | -0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.318 | -0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.318 | -0.0% |
| 2005 | -0.318 | -0.0% |
| 2006 | -0.318 | -0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.318 | -0.0% |
| 2008 | -0.241 | -24.2% |
| 2009 | -0.241 | -0.0% |
| 2010 | -0.241 | -0.0% |
| 2011 | -0.241 | -0.0% |
| 2012 | -0.241 | -0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.233 | -3.3% |
| 2014 | -0.233 | -0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.233 | -0.0% |
| 2016 | -0.159 | -31.8% |
| 2017 | -0.159 | -0.0% |
| 2018 | -0.389 | +144.7% |
| 2019 | -0.389 | -0.0% |
| 2020 | -0.389 | -0.0% |
| 2021 | -0.466 | +19.8% |
| 2022 | -0.652 | +39.9% |
| 2023 | -0.897 | +37.6% |
| 2024 | 0.079 | -108.8% |
| 2025 | 0.66 | +735.4% |
Guatemala compared with similar countries
- Guatemala's 0.66 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755, 8.7× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Guatemala's 0.66 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.519, 1.3× the median. (25 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | -2.19 | -2.19 | -2.19 | 1 |
| 1790s | -2.19 | -2.19 | -2.19 | 10 |
| 1800s | -2.19 | -2.19 | -2.19 | 10 |
| 1810s | -2.19 | -2.19 | -2.19 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.19 | -2.19 | -2.18 | 9 |
| 1830s | -2.18 | -2.18 | -2.18 | 10 |
| 1840s | -0.819 | -0.819 | -0.819 | 10 |
| 1850s | -0.819 | -0.819 | -0.819 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.819 | -0.819 | -0.819 | 10 |
| 1870s | -2.06 | -2.19 | -0.819 | 10 |
| 1880s | -2.19 | -2.19 | -2.19 | 10 |
| 1890s | -2.2 | -2.24 | -2.19 | 10 |
| 1900s | -2.24 | -2.24 | -2.24 | 10 |
| 1910s | -2.24 | -2.24 | -2.24 | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.26 | -1.71 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.55 | -1.66 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.7911 | -1.8 | 0.511 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.54 | -2.77 | -0.25 | 10 |
| 1960s | -2.4 | -2.64 | -1.88 | 10 |
| 1970s | -2.41 | -2.98 | -1.98 | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.21 | -2.98 | -1.16 | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.03 | -1.24 | -0.87 | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.3026 | -0.318 | -0.241 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.2518 | -0.389 | -0.159 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2775 | -0.897 | 0.66 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
- 67 East Timor 0.745 compare
- 68 Trinidad and Tobago 0.743 compare
- 69 Moldova 0.711 compare
- 71 Cape Verde 0.651 compare
- 72 Nepal 0.65 compare
- 73 Albania 0.646 compare
More reference data data for Guatemala
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9286 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.39 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1246 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.72 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.9 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 18.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6786 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Guatemala?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Guatemala was 0.66 in 2025, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 0.66 in 2025.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.98 in 1979.
- How does Guatemala rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Guatemala ranks 70th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 383.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and impartial public administration score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 236 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).