Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Serbia
Serbia: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) was 96.88 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Serbia, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 96.88 for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 14.8% on the previous year and up 24.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Serbia peaked at 96.88 in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2003.
That places Serbia 1st out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0 | — |
| 2004 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 78.12 | — |
| 2007 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 78.12 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 84.38 | +8.0% |
| 2013 | 84.38 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 84.38 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 84.38 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 84.38 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 84.38 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 84.38 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 96.88 | +14.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.64 | 0 | 78.12 | 7 |
| 2010s | 84.38 | 78.12 | 96.88 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 2 United States 93.75 compare
- 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 93.75 compare
- 2 Germany 93.75 compare
- 2 North Macedonia 93.75 compare
- 2 Puerto Rico 93.75 compare
- 2 Rwanda 93.75 compare
More reference data data for Serbia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Serbia?
- Resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) in Serbia was 96.88 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 96.88 in 2019.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2003.
- How does Serbia rank for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- Serbia ranks 1st out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 24.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.