North Macedonia vs Serbia: Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)
North Macedonia
93.75
in 2019
Serbia
96.88
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
2nd
Serbia rank
1st
Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) over time
- North Macedonia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 96.88 against 93.75 in North Macedonia, a difference of 3.13.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.36 | 44.64 | 35.71 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 90 | 84.38 | 5.62 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16), North Macedonia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 96.88 against 93.75 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) between North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 3.13, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Serbia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Serbia rank globally for resolving insolvency: strength of insolvency framework index (0-16)?
- North Macedonia ranks 2nd and Serbia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Strength of insolvency framework index (0-16) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for strength of insolvency framework index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.